EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / TABLE OF CONTENTS

Click here for a listing of all updates to this website.

Looking for a certain word or phrase? Detour on over to our glossary! It'll set you on track.

Click here for a listing of all our source citations.

This is a non-commercial, volunteer-run website adamant about bringing you the truth, not rumor or sensationalism. Click here for more details.

The best news comes from real people, not agenda-driven news organizations. Click here to see how you can send us your Covid news.

Click here for some of the top videos explaining the truth about Covid.

Via this section, you can interact first-hand with those experiencing Covid adverse events.

Here are some of the top news sites regarding the truth about Covid.

Check out these authoritative websites re: Covid.

In this section, you'll read about what the criteria is to be considered a vaccine (Hint: Covid doesn't qualify).

Here, you'll see the difference between natural and artificial immunity. The latest news re: the Delta variant and boosters.

See the proof that the Covid Crisis was anticipated well before 2020, why national leaders really don't believe the stuff they're yapping about and more government lies.

Is there a link between the Bible and Covid? You be the judge! Click here for details.

Here, you'll be informed about what you should know before taking the jab.

Here, you'll learn more about the various brands of shots, as well as the truth about their manufacturers.

This section details the studies conducted regarding injections.

This section details the tests (or shall we say, the lack thereof) conducted before injections were distributed.

Here, you'll read the latest discoveries on how ineffective the injections are. You'll learn more about some really critical concepts like Absolute Risk Reduction, Antibody Levels and Breakthrough cases.

Here, you'll see what happened to some people after they god the jab. Warning: Graphic images.

Click here to see just how screwed up Covid reporting is...and how leaders are trying to make it worse.

Medical providers are under overwhelming pressure to do the wrong thing. See why, and what they're doing about it.

This section details what others are doing to exempt themselves from getting the jab.

See what are some people doing after they've caught Covid?

What are some doing after they've taken the jab? Read here for more.

Details can be found here re: why masks aren’t justified and are harmful to the general population.

You'll read information here re: health passports.

Click here to see how well mandates are working out worldwide.

See here how surge teams are intended to educate people about the jabs right in their home doorways. Uh huh.

Are lockdowns effective? Click here to see.

Click here to see the plans underway to isolate the unjabbed away from their homes and families.

RESOURCES

Note: We continue to see dramatic, “click bait” headlines on stories regarding COVID. When reading articles, please independently verify what they’re saying. 

  • Natural News
    • Our review: A wealth of Covid-related information published daily. So in terms of quantity, they're hard to beat. Unfortunately, the quality often lacks because headlines are often sensationalized/"click bait," leaving you spending a lot of time sifting to find the true facts.
  • The Highwire with Del Bigtree
  • Medical Tyranny
  • Pandemic News
  • The Covid Blog
    • Updated stories of new deaths due to taking the jab
  • Children’s Health Defense
  • Sharyl Attkisson
    • Kind of the opposite of Natural News. Sharyl is one of the last true independent investigative reporters left. She doesn't focus solely on Covid. But when she reports it, her facts are usually air-tight.

Do you have a suggestion for a news webpage? Contact us today and let us know!

COVID-19

Summary: The "vaccines" we see now technically aren't vaccines.

Just what is a vaccine?

  • (9/8/21) Investigative Reporter Sharyl Atkisson: The CDC has changed the definition of "vaccines" to fit Covid-19 vaccine limitations. (Before long, the definition will be changed to "it's a shot"). [402]

  • 2015-2021 definition: 
    • A vaccine must:
      • Stimulate immunity in the person receiving it.
      • Disrupt transmission (of the pathogen to others).
    • Dr. David Martin and Dr. Lee Merritt:
      • "Vaccines actually are a legally defined term, and they’re a legally defined term under public health law, they’re legally defined term under the CDC and FDA standards.
      • A vaccine specifically has to stimulate both an immunity within the person who is receiving it, but it also has to disrupt transmission." [177], [178]

Technically, the COVID-19 “vaccine” isn't even a vaccine.

  • A “vaccine” is "an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated pathogenic agent (such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)." [15]
  • Dr. David Martin and Dr. Lee Merritt:
    • "This is not a vaccine. This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator, not an immuno-transmissive response." [177], [178]
    • "A vaccine specifically has to stimulate both an immunity within the person who is receiving it, but it also has to disrupt transmission. And that is not what this is." [177], [178]
    • "They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell, it is not to stop transmission. It is a treatment." [177], [178]

(8/6/21) CDC Director: Vaccines don't meet one of the two definitions of a vaccine.

  • "Vaccines prevent death but what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission."
  • The "vaccine's" only benefit: it presumably reduces the severity of symptoms (yet there is no data substantiating that claim).
  • Both the vaxxed and non-vaxxed person walking into a restaurant, store, group, venue or workplace present the exact same risk to other people there. So how does the presentation of proof of vaccine make any difference?
  • (If a vaccinated and non-vaccinated person have the same capacity to carry, shed and transmit the virus – with or without symptoms – then what difference does a vaccination passport or vaccination ID make?)
  • There is no evidence that vaccinated asymptomatic carriers are asymptomatic because of the vaccine. There are likely just as many asymptomatic non-vaccinated carriers. The data shows an equally distributed infection rate regardless of vaccination rate, which is simultaneously admitted by Direcor Walensky, which, as an outcome, is an admission that undercuts the entire argument for compulsory vaccines. [240]

Even Moderna agrees.

  • The "vaccine" is actually an "operating system" -- "the "Software of Life" -- designed to program human beings and turn their cells into efficient drug delivery systems. [214]
  • "Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program" or "app" is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein." [214]

Summary: Guess which process develops stronger, longer-lasting immunity: Natural immunity or the shots?

Natural immunity

  • Overall Facts
    • (9/8/21) Here's a terrific in-depth investigative report on natural immunity. It's regularly updated with new facts. [403]
    • CDC: An estimated 120 million Americans had been infected with COVID-19 as of May 2021. [438]
  • Natural immunity effectiveness
    • Natural immunity offers robust protection against all variants, whereas vaccine-induced immunity can’t. [265]
      • When you acquire the infection naturally, your body develops antibodies against ALL of the viral proteins. When you have natural immunity your antibodies will recognize all parts of the virus, so even if the spike protein is mutated, your body will recognize other parts of the virus and mount an attack against those. [265]
      • Natural immunity brings immunity against the entire virus, whereas "vaccines" bring immunity against just the spike protein. [265]
      • Shots only trigger antibodies against one (namely the spike) protein. When you have antibodies against just one of the viral proteins, the virus only needs to mutate that one protein in order to evade your immune system. [265]
      • (Brian Hooker, Ph.D., Children’s Health Defense chief scientific officer) “Natural immunity — with a more diverse array of antibodies and T-cell receptors — will provide better protection overall as it has more targets in which to attack the virus, whereas vaccine-derived immunity only focuses on one portion of the virus, in this case, the spike protein. Once that portion of the virus has mutated sufficiently, the vaccine no longer is effective.” [265]
    • The CDC itself acknowledges that immunity to a virus can occur “through infection with the actual disease (resulting in natural immunity).” [439]
    • When asked to comment on the effectiveness of natural immunity against the virus based on recent studies from Israel, Fauci stated he did not "have a real firm answer" on that. [408] [433]
  • Government ignorance
    • Vaccinating people who have had Covid-19: Why doesn't natural immunity count in the U.S.? [452]
    • The CDC and the FDA have openly admitted that they have not fully studied natural immunity, while also promoting vaccination over natural immunity. [440]
    • The FDA has also stated “[a]t this time, researchers do not know whether the presence of antibodies means that you are immune to COVID-19; or if you are immune, how long it will last.” [434]
    • Almost 20 months into the pandemic, it is shocking that the chief medical advisor to the president does not have a firm grasp on the effectiveness of natural immunity, but still promotes freedom-robbing vaccine mandates. [440]
  • General studies
    • Multiple studies around the world: The odds of people who have recovered from Covid getting reinfected and ending up in the hospital is much smaller than the odds of the fully-vaccinated getting Covid.
    • 15 studies that indicate natural immunity from prior infection is more robust than the COVID vaccines [454]
  • Israeli studies: Natural immunity may provide similar or even better protection than vaccines in the fight against COVID-19.
    • April 2021 ("Goldberg") study
      • Researchers found that, in terms of protecting against COVID-19, previous Covid-19 infection provided similar protection compared to the BioNTech vaccine. [433]
    • August 2021 ("Gazit") study
      • Israel found that individuals with previous infection had 13 times the protection from the Delta variant than fully vaccinated, previously uninfected individuals. [287], [296], [436]
      • The same study found that there was a 27 fold increased risk for symptomatic breakthrough infection in vaccinated individuals compared to reinfection for individuals with natural immunity. [287], [296], [436]
      • Israeli researchers placed over 76,000 Israelis in three groups: the doubly vaccinated (with the Pfizer vaccine), the previously infected but unvaccinated, and the previously infected with only a single vaccine dose.
      • “This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalisation caused by the Delta variant,” the authors conclude.
      • The study has been described by infectious diseases expert Professor Francois Balloux as a “bombshell” development.
      • People injected with COVID-19 vaccines have a higher chance of catching the virus than unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors. [287], [296], [436]
      • Vaccinated people were 13x as likely to be infected and 27x to have symptomatic infections as a matched cohort that was previously infected(whereas the injections just target the spikes). [287], [296], [436]
      • Natural immunity is far superior than artificial immunity against the Delta variant, because it recognizes the entire protein. [287], [296], [436]
      • “The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the [B16172] delta variant … than two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine” [287], [296], [436]
      • (8/26/21) Dr. Eric Topol of Scripps Research Institute in California: “We continue to underestimate the importance of natural infection immunity … especially when [infection] is recent.” [386]
      • (8/26/21) Dr. Charlotte Thalin of Sweden’s Karolinska Institute: The Israeli study’s discovery is a “textbook example of how natural immunity is really better than vaccination.” [386]
  • US studies
    • (9/10/21) Harvard Medical School Study: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection induces more durable immunity than vaccination. [447]
      • Natural immunity: Antibody response was highest upon natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, with preservation of 60 to 80% of peak antibody levels for up to 220 days post-symptom onset. [447]
      • Fully vaccinated Covid-19 naïve individuals: Antibody levels after 134 days of second vaccination dropped to the levels observed in unvaccinated COVID-19 recovered individuals after 220 days of symptom onset. [447]
      • A significantly higher neutralization efficacy against all tested variants (alpha, beta, gamma, and delta) was observed in unvaccinated Covid-19 recovered individuals than in vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals. [447]
    • (6/9/21) Cleveland Clinic study: People who had COVID were less likely to be reinfected than fully vaccinated individuals who never had virus [455], [456]
      • Suggests vaccine is of no benefit to people who already had COVID [455], [456]
    • (10/6/20) Harvard study: Naturally-acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is potent, long-lasting and very broad in scope, as you develop both antibodies and T cells that target multiple components of the virus and not just one. [265]
    • Earlier this year, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) published an article about a January 2021 study from the La Jolla Institute for Immunology with the headline “Lasting immunity found after recovery from COVID-19.” The article stated that the researchers found that more than 95% of those who recovered from COVID-19 had durable immune system memory of the virus up to 8 months later. [437]
  • Vaccinating the naturally immune
    • Federal health officials have not acknowledged this phenomenon, and are pressing those who already have better presumed immunity to get vaccinated, anyway. [441]
    • CDC and some other health officials claim that naturally-immune people can benefit even more if they get vaccinate. However, that is contradicted by multiple experts and studies. [441]
    • Earlier this year, CDC and its vaccine advisers got caught falsely telling physicians and the public that Moderna and Pfizer studies showed those who already had Covid can benefit further from vaccination. That was false; the studies found no benefit. [441]
    • A similar fabrication was repeated in a recent article in Science magazine but was corrected when a reader flagged it. [441]
    • If we are to depend on vaccine-induced immunity, as public health officials are urging us to do, we’ll end up on a never-ending booster treadmill. Boosters will absolutely be necessary, as the shot offers such narrow protection against a single protein of the virus. Already, data around the world show vaccine-induced protection is waning rapidly in the face of new variants, and Moderna has publicly stated that the need for additional boosters is expected. [265]
  • The role of antibodies
    • However, virologists say many people are immune without having developed antibodies. Therefore, antibody tests are not the only measure of whether a person has immunity from Covid either with or without having symptoms. [441]
    • Some people who have recovered from Covid-19 will have measurable antibodies in their blood. [441]
    • Public health officials have not offered plans to find ways for people to learn if they have immunity to Covid and, therefore, may not need to be vaccinated. Some experts say exposing already-immune people to side effects from the vaccination, however slight or unknown, is ethically irresponsible and potentially dangerous for some. [441]

Variants (in general)

[315]

  • Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla thinks it's "likely" that a variant could emerge that evades protection by the company's COVID-19 vaccine. [319]
  • Other scientific experts have expressed similar views. [319]

The Delta Variant

  • (Fauci) The Delta variant is both more transmissible and more dangerous than the original virus and previous variants. [265]
    • (7/4/21) “It is more effective and efficient in its ability to transmit from person to person. And studies that we’ve seen where they have been the variant that’s dominated in other countries, it’s clear that it appears to be more lethal in the sense of more serious — allow you to get more serious disease leading to hospitalization, and in some cases leading to deaths.” [265]
  • Real-world data: It is actually weaker and far less dangerous, even though it does spread more easily. [265]
    • The Delta variant contains three different mutations, all in the spike protein. This allows this variant to evade the immune responses in those who have received the COVID jabs — but not those who have natural immunity which, again, is much broader. [265]
    • While those who benefit from keeping the pandemic going would like you to cower in fear at the thought of the Delta variant, there’s really no evidence that it’s any worse than the original. It’s more transmissible, yes, but far less dangerous, as its primary symptoms are that of a regular cold. [265]
    • Example:  Sweden
      • (8/3/21) Mask-free Sweden is close to ZERO daily Covid deaths as country's chief epidemiologist plays down fears over Delta variant's infectiousness
        Sweden dropped its last remaining mask rule - for public transport - on July 1
      • As of 8/3/21, Sweden recorded average of less than one Covid death per day over a 14-day period.
      • Compare that with 74 deaths in UK and 329 deaths in US per day over same period.
        • The Delta variant has been the dominant strain in Sweden, circulating "for quite some time."

    • But health chiefs in UK and US warn masks must remain because of Delta variant [184]
    • (7/29/21) New York Times: "The Delta variant is as contagious as chickenpox and may be spread by vaccinated people as easily as the unvaccinated, an internal C.D.C. report said." [172]
    • To date, no robust scientific evidence proves that any of the variants identified are more transmissible or deadly than the original. By definition, variants are clinically identical. Once there is a clinical difference, then a new “strain” of virus has emerged. Prior knowledge of viral mutation shows they usually evolve to become less deadly and more transmissible. This optimizes their chance of spreading, as dead hosts tend not to spread viruses, and very ill hosts have reduced mobility and thus limit contact with others. [116]
    • SARS-CoV-2 variants have long spread globally as the current seasonal corona cold viruses and continue to change continuously. Thus, they are “chronically” novel. Studies of pre-Covid-19 blood suggest that over 80% of people may already be immune even to such continually mutated coronaviruses because of their relatedness to other cold coronaviruses. Since our cellular cross-immunity recognizes and fends off multiple individual components of different corona derivatives, severe corona infections are very rare. [117]

Boosters

  • Official claims: They're good/needed
    • (9/2/21) Fauci wants three shots to be the "new norm" [335]
    • (8/28/21) Fauci discusses coronavirus booster shots every five months [317]
    • (8/18/21, Biden) The booster shot “will boost your immune response.” “It will increase your protection from Covid-19.” [268]
    • (8/17/21) The Biden administration has decided most Americans should get a COVID vaccine booster dose eight months after they received their second shot, despite consensus among U.S. health experts last month there wasn’t enough data to recommend boosters for the general population. [267]
    • (8/18/21, Fauci) Everybody will “likely” need a booster shot at some point. [268]
    • (8/18/21) The U.S. will begin wide distribution of Covid booster shots beginning the week of Sept. 20. [268]
    • (8/4/21) The World Health Organization’s (WHO) calls for a moratorium on distributing COVID-19 booster shots. [330] But the Biden Administration rejects that moratorium. [330]
    • (Walensky) “We are starting to see evidence of reduced protection against mild and moderate disease,” [268]
  • The facts
    • (9/17/21) A key U.S. Food and Drug Administration panel voted against a universal booster shot for the most popular COVID-19 vaccine. [458]
      • Instead, the panel endorsed a booster only for certain Americans: those 65 and older plus younger people who are at high risk of disease owing to underlying conditions. [458]
    • (9/13/21) U.S. and international scientists: Data shows Covid booster shots are 'not appropriate' at this time. Comments were published in the peer-reviewed journal The Lancet. [461]
      • "Current evidence does not, therefore, appear to show a need for boosting in the general population, in which efficacy against severe disease remains high," the scientists wrote, adding the wide distribution of boosters is "not appropriate at this stage in the pandemic." [461]
    • (8/30/21) CDC scientist: The data needed to properly evaluate Covid-19 vaccine booster shots for the general population is limited. [309]
    • (8/19/21) Scientists have sharply criticized the Biden administration’s push to widely distribute booster shots, saying data provided by federal health officials isn’t compelling enough to recommend third shots to most of the American population right now. [310]
    • (8/20/21) Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and an adviser to the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration: Booster shots are scaring people: "We sent a terrible message. We just sent a message out there that people who consider themselves fully vaccinated were not fully vaccinated. And that's the wrong message because you are protected against serious illness." [313]
    • (7/1/21) The CDC’s advisory committee last month said there wasn’t enough evidence to recommend booster shots, even as Pfizer reassured investors during an earnings call boosters would be needed long after the pandemic ends. [267]
    • Officials said more data — and possibly several more months — would be needed before regulators could determine whether booster shots were necessary. [267]
    • If the Biden Administration wants to "Stick with the science" (as it says when it devalues other potential treatments, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine), then where are the studies that show boosters are the best strategy to undertake?
  • Israel, where the boosters are beginning to fail
    • (9/5/21) Israel is planning to administer FOURTH Covid shot which could be adjusted to fight new variants as country battles wave of infections despite hugely successful vaccine roll-out. [388]
      • "This is our life from now on, in waves."
      • "Thinking about this and the waning of the vaccines and the antibodies, it seems every few months — it could be once a year or five or six months — we'll need another shot."
      • So to be clear: Despite having the highest number of shots and highest number of shots with boosters in the world, the Israelis also have the highest rate of Covid in the world. It doesn't take a genius to conclude that the injections are not only not working, but they're also exacerbating the problem. This will soon require more shots than a tequila bar.
    • (8/8/21) Times of Israel
      • "14 Israelis who got 3rd shot later infected with COVID-19; Limited data not enough to draw conclusions on booster’s effectiveness; ministers said to fight over potential lockdown, restriction exemption for shuls" [273]
      • "Meanwhile, in a Sunday meeting, government ministers fought over the prospect of a nationwide lockdown during the upcoming High Holiday period amid surging COVID-19 cases, according to leaks published on Hebrew-language media." [273]
    • (8/9/21) Alex Berenson
      • "As Covid cases, hospitalizations, and now deaths soar in Israel even though over 90 percent of older adults are fully vaccinated, the country is aggressively pushing a third shot. [274]
      • Hundreds of thousands of older Israelis have already received it. [274]
      • And other countries are preparing to follow. [274]
      • Now the inevitable is happening. The third shot is beginning to fail. [274]
      • The desperate move for a third shot is the latest and maybe most desperate manifestation of the panic around the vaccine failure that health authorities still will not openly admit is happening. [274]
      • The real-world data - from Israel, the United States, and everywhere else - are clear. Protection from infection fades within months even against the original coronavirus. It shrinks essentially to zero against the Delta variant (we can argue about time vs. variant effects, but the answer doesn’t matter in this context, either way the vaccines have stopped working). [274]
      • For now, vaccine advocates are clinging to the hope that even if the vaccines do not protect against infection, they still provide some protection against more serious illness and death. I think the jury is still out on that question, but again it is largely irrelevant for this conversation - the Covid wards are filling in Israel, and most people in them are older and vaccinated. If the vaccines do offer any help after a few months against serious illness, it is far less than the 95-99 percent protection that advocates have claimed. [274]
      • Thus the move for a third shot. And possibly more shots to come. [274]
      • Here’s a PARTIAL list of questions we haven’t answered: [274]
        • Does a third dose of the vaccine ACTUALLY REDUCE INFECTIONS IN THOSE PEOPLE WHO RECEIVE IT? [274]
        • Does it reduce deaths (remember, even the original, huge Covid trials didn’t answer that question)? [274]
        • Will the third dose produce a transient spike in infections, as the first dose appears to? [274]
        • Will the antibodies last longer this time because we have more of them after the second dose, or will they decline more quickly? [274]
        • Does the vaccine confer ANY long-term protection through T-cell immunity? [274]
        • Will people who have received a third dose be vulnerable to future variants? Will they be more or less vulnerable than people who have been infected and recovered and are are naturally immune? [274]
        • Will the side effects - which are generally much worse after the second dose than the first - be still worse after the third? [274]
        • Will some people die from those side effects? [274]
        • What is the overall safety profile of the third or more doses in a large population? [274]
        • Does it differ by age? [274]
      • I could go on, but I hope this is enough to show you how little we know." [274]

Antibodies

  • Covid-19 Antibody test costs and information. [341]
  • FAQ for Antibody Test Result [342]

Summary: Fauci predicted the pandemic in 2017. Not far back enough? OK -- Dr. Pierre Gilbert detailed everything we're seeing happening now back in 1995.

Deception #1: The Covid Crisis was unanticipated

  • (4/18/18) Bill Gates: A coming disease will cause a global pandemic, could kill 30 million people within 6 months and we should prepare for it as we do for war. [343]
  • Fauci knew back in early 2020 that COVID-19 injections threaten to enhance disease. [32]
  • Moderna sent COVID-19 jab "samples" to UNC weeks before the pandemic was announced. [7]
  • A leaked email - A scientist who manipulated coronaviruses thanked Fauci for lying about COVID-19. [8]

Deception #2: Hypocrites -- Elected leader hypocrisy (in not wearing masks after telling people to do so; aka "Do as I say, not as I do")

  • (9/13/21) Nancy Pelosi: Masks up for Official Ground Zero photos, then drops the mask when she thinks she's off-camera [442]
  • (8/30/21) Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren partied maskless at wedding in New Mexico, in defiance of state COVID-19 restrictions. [318]
  • (8/21/21) Speaker Nancy Pelosi again at a fundraiser. [283]
  • (8/7/21) Barak Obama's birthday party [192]
  • (7/30/21) D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser [193]
  • (5/21/21) Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot [194]
  • (11/18/20) California Gov. Gavin Newsom at party [195]
  • (9/2/20) Speaker Nancy Pelosi [196]

Deception #3: Government Lies

  • (As presented by Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, Mike Yeadon; Yeadon spent 32 years in the pharmaceutical industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with "the most senior research position" in his field.)
    • "Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death."
    • "Look out the window, and think, "why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?" Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They're going to kill you and your family."
    • There is "no possibility" current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is "just a lie."
    • Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just "convergent opportunism," but a "conspiracy." Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
    • Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded "top-up" ("booster") injections for the "variants." The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 jab campaign.
    • Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these "top-up" injections will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to "perform any clinical safety studies."
    • Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA injections "go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification." [12]
  • Canada's top pathologist, Dr. Roger Hodkinson - Pandemic is "Biggest Hoax Ever Perpetrated" and "positive test results do not mean a clinical infection. It is simply driving public hysteria." [13]
  • Toronto ER Doctor's Personal Testimony

Deception #4: “Rona [i.e. the coronavirus that causes Covid-19] has never been isolated or photographed. Because it doesn’t exist.”

  • The virus that causes Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) has been isolated and photographed many times. These images were produced by NIAID's Rocky Mountain Laboratories (in Hamilton, Montana) on Feb. 11, 2020 using scanning and transmission electron microscopes. [340]

INJECTIONS

Summary: Manufacturers' fact sheets lack the information required by consumers to make an informed decision about the jab. So much for learning from history (a la the Nuremberg Code).

  • Here's the Moderna fact sheet, totally devoid of prevailing adverse events, deaths, animal study results, contra indications for pregnant and lactating women, Covid-recovered rates by age group, alternative therapeutics, and, most significantly, the 20 serious adverse events of Covid-19 jabs published in an October 2020 CDC/FDA symposium. Pg. 16 and the DNA-altering properties of mRNA inoculations or that the jabbed are part of clinical trials currently underway and slated to end in October 2022 for Moderna.
  • The same can be said of the Pfizer fact sheet (here). Its clinical trials end in May 2023.
  • “The Israeli people have not been given the information required to make a sufficient risk benefit analysis in this extraordinary endeavor. In fact, they have been given little information at all and that includes complete opacity of data on the unfolding outcomes of adverse reactions currently taking place. Our citizens must first and foremost define the discussion in order to accurately weigh their choices. What they are being asked to inject is not a vaccine as defined by the CDC as “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Rather, it is an experimental and novel technology. By definition of the FDA as a component used as treatment to affect a body’s function, it is in fact a medical device, a physical device that comes in a molecular sized package. Erroneously referring to this intervention as a vaccine exploits the public's ingrained trust of the vaccination program to solicit knee jerk response and action. It keeps us entrenched in needless debate in place of taking the necessary measures to investigate the impact on our health.”  [109]
  • SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials excluded the elderly, making it impossible to identify the occurrence of post-vaccination eosinophilia and enhanced inflammation in elderly people. Most trials also excluded pregnant and lactating volunteers, as well as those with chronic and serious conditions such as tuberculosis, hepatitis C, autoimmunity, coagulopathies, cancer, and immune suppression, although these recipients are now being offered the vaccine under the premise of safety. Another criterion for exclusion from nearly all trials was prior exposure to SARS-CoV- This is unfortunate as it denied the opportunity of obtaining extremely relevant information concerning post-vaccination ADE in people that already have anti-SARSCov-2 antibodies. To the best of our knowledge, ADE is not being monitored systematically for any age or medical condition group currently being administered the vaccine. Moreover, despite a substantial proportion of the population already having antibodies, tests to determine SARS-CoV-2-antibody status prior to administration of the vaccine are not conducted routinely. [110]
  • Under 21 U.S. Code §360bbb-3 (which is the law governing the Emergency Use Authorizations of experimental jabs), the following is required before administration of a jab under an EUA:
    • Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed:
    • (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
    • (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
    • (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
  • There is no additional information being provided to the unjabbed as required by the Nuremberg code in order to arrive at informed consent. Failure to have informed consent constitutes a crime against humanity, for which Nazi doctors were hung.

The Nuremberg Code

1 The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2 The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3 The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4 The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5 No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6 The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7 Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject a against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8 The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9 During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10 During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Summary: Would you trust a known felon -- who paid hundreds of millions or even billions in fines for fraudulently promoting their pharmaceuticals -- with your health? Well, guess who made the COVID "vaccines." What do you think of their track records so far?

"Endless variants, endless vaccines, endless booster shots, endless COVID restrictions, endless profits."

[311]

Liability

  • In the U.S., vaccine makers cannot be sued, even if they are shown to be negligent. [344]
  • First established in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act [344]
  • Reinforced by the PREP Act [344]
  • If drug companies willfully choose to put harmful products in the market, when they can be sued, why would we trust any product where they have NO liability?
  • Given the free pass from liability, and the checkered past of these companies, why would we assume that all their vaccines are safe and made completely above board?

AstraZeneca

  • History
    • Astra Zeneca has lost so many lawsuits it’s hard to count. Here’s one. [348] Here’s another [349]
    • And in case you missed it, the company had their Covid vaccine suspended in at least 18 countries over concerns of blood clots [350]
    • They completely botched their meeting with the FDA with numbers from their study that didn’t match. [351]
    • Pay outs: 21, totaling $1.14 billion [111]
    • AstraZeneca was fined $520 million to resolve allegations that it illegally promoted the antipsychotic drug Seroquel. The drug was approved for treating schizophrenia and later for bipolar mania, but the government alleged that AstraZeneca promoted Seroquel for a variety of unapproved uses, such as aggression, sleeplessness, anxiety, and depression. [112]
  • Adverse Events
    • (8/25/21) Peer-reviewed study: AstraZeneca "vaccine" causes “devastating” blood clots [291], [294]
    • Massachusetts Medical Society researchers studies 220 cases as either “definite” or “probable” cases of blood clotting (vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, or VITT).
    • All 220 recognized cases had received the first dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.
    • 41% of the patients with recognized VITT were diagnosed with no underlying health conditions (they were perfectly healthy before they received the AstraZeneca shot).
    • The overall mortality rate for the 220 recognized VITT cases was 22%.
      Post-vaccine horror: Blood clot victims develop severe headache, pain, then shortness of breath just 6 days after J&J vaccination [129]
    • Euro Study: Clot Risk To 18-39s From AstraZeneca jab Is TWICE As High As Covid Death Risk [72]

Pfizer/BioNTech - "Cominarty"

  • History
    • Pfizer has the distinction of the biggest criminal payout in history. They have lost so many lawsuits it’s hard to count. You can check out their rap sheet here. [346]
    • Maybe that’s why they are demanding that countries where they don’t have liability protection put up collateral to cover vaccine-injury lawsuits. [347]
    • Pay outs: 71, totaling $4.6 billion [113]
    • In 2009, Pfizer paid out $2.3 billion for fraudulent marketing, then the largest health care fraud settlement and the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States. Pfizer pled guilty to misbranding the painkiller Bextra with "the intent to defraud or mislead", promoting the drug to treat acute pain at dosages the FDA had previously deemed dangerously high. Bextra was pulled from the market in 2005 due to safety concerns. The government alleged that Pfizer also promoted three other drugs illegally: the antipsychotic Geodon, an antibiotic Zyvox, and the antiepileptic drug Lyrica. [114]
  • FDA approval
    • (8/23/21) FDA grants full approval of Pfizer "vaccine" for people 16 years and older [290]
    • Problems with this approval
      • Full approval was based on only six months' worth of data - despite clinical trials designed for two years.
      • No public discussion of the data, despite the FDA's saying it was "committed to use an advisory committee composed of independent experts to ensure deliberations about authorization or licensure are transparent for the public."
        • These public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorization.
        • Result: Making decisions behind closed doors can fuel hesitancy. That's why it's important to have a public discussion about what kind of data are there and what the limitations are.
      • There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed.
  • Fact sheet
    • Here's the Pfizer fact sheet. Its clinical trials end in May 2023.
    • Comirnaty: Adults and children 12 and up are eligible to receive. [327]
    • Moderna and Johnson & Johnson: Only adults are eligible to receive (their studies in children have not yet been completed). [327]
  • FDA praise for the Pfizer jab
    • The FDA says of the newly-approved Pfizer-BioNTech "vaccine", "the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product." [285]
  • Testing -- Prior to FDA approval, Cominarty had: [312]
    • No carcinogenicity tests (Section 13.1).
    • No genotoxicitty tests (Section 13.1).
    • No male fertility impairment tests (Section 13.1).
    • No milk excretion/lactation tests (Section 8.2)
    • No tests on subjects < 16 years old (Section 8.4)
    • Pregnancy-related risk profile data is insufficient (Section 8.1)
    • No information on long-term potential for myocarditis and pericarditis (Section 5.2)
    • "Comirnaty may not protect all vaccine recipients" (Section 5.5)
  • Effectiveness
    • (8/26/21) Israeli Study: Natural immunity 13x more effective than vaccines at stopping delta [287], [296]
      • Here is a link to the original pre-print study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full.pdf
      • Vaccinated people were 13x as likely to be infected and 27x to have symptomatic infections as a matched cohort that was previously infected.
      • And this is with Delta dominant.
      • Israeli researchers placed over 76,000 Israelis in three groups: the doubly vaccinated (with the Pfizer vaccine), the previously infected but unvaccinated, and the previously infected with only a single vaccine dose.
      • “This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalisation caused by the Delta variant,” the authors conclude.
      • The study has been described by infectious diseases expert Professor Francois Balloux as a “bombshell” development.
    • (7/22/21) Israel’s Health Ministry recently said effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has fallen to 40% [223]
    • Study: Pfizer vaccine was only 42% effective against infection in July, when the Delta variant was dominant. [243]
  • Adverse Events
    • Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis [285]

  • Israeli People Committee’s Report Find Catastrophic Side Effects of Pfizer jab to Every System in Human Body [74]
  • Pfizer trial on FDA site shows that 60% more people got COVID-19 in vaccinated group vs. placebo group: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group. It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.” [103]
  • The pictures are appalling and horrific: One woman (who took the Pfizer jab a week before) experienced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, which doctors have attributed to the vaccine. She had "no previous medical history." [284]

Johnson & Johnson

  • History
    • Johnson & Johnson has lost major lawsuits in 1995, 1996, 2001, 2010, 2011, 2016, 2019 [345]
    • Pay outs: 58, totaling $4.2 billion [115]
    • Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay a $2.2 billion fine to resolve criminal and civil allegations relating to the prescription drugs Risperdal, Invega and Natrecor. The government alleged that J&J promoted these drugs for uses not approved as safe and effective by the FDA, targeted elderly dementia patients in nursing homes, and paid kickbacks to physicians and to the nation’s largest long-term care pharmacy provider, Omnicare Inc. As part of the agreement, Johnson & Johnson admitted that it promoted Risperdal for treatment of psychotic symptoms in non-schizophrenic patients, although the drug was approved only to treat schizophrenia. [116]
  • Adverse Events
    • (7/22/21) The European Union added Guillain-Barré syndrome, an autoimmune paralysis disorder, as a possible side effect from Johnson & Johnson's Covid-19 vaccine. [226]

Moderna

  • Injection
    • Here's the Moderna fact sheet, totally devoid of prevailing adverse events, deaths, animal study results, contra indications for pregnant and lactating women, Covid-recovered rates by age group, alternative therapeutics, and, most significantly, the 20 serious adverse events of Covid-19 jabs published in an October 2020 CDC/FDA symposium. Pg. 16 and the DNA-altering properties of mRNA inoculations or that the jabbed are part of clinical trials currently underway and slated to end in October 2022 for Moderna.
    • It's not a real vaccine
      • The "vaccine" is actually an "operating system" -- "the "Software of Life" -- designed to program human beings and turn their cells into efficient drug delivery systems. [214]
      • "Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program" or "app" is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein." [214]
  •  Effectiveness
    • High-quality real-world safety data on the messenger RNA (mRNA)–based Covid-19 vaccines remains relatively sparse in the literature. [297]
      • The results of a study based on data reported by more than 600,000 vaccinated persons were recently published; that study mainly assessed common and mild side effects.
    • Two additional studies
      • Were based on surveys of vaccinated participants, involved small cohorts, and
      • Another study analyzed adverse events reported in the VAERS database.
      • All these studies lacked controls.
    • Study: Moderna vaccine was only 76% effective against infection in July, when the Delta variant was dominant. [243]
    • Even Moderna admits it doesn't know how effective its formulation is.
      • "available data are insufficient to make conclusions about benefit in individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection." [25]
      • We don't know if the injection will stop people from dying ("A larger number of individuals at high risk of COVID-19 and higher attack rates would be needed to confirm efficacy of the jab against mortality.") [25]
      • We don't know if the injection will make getting the disease even worse ("Data are limited to assess the effect of the jab against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination.") [25]
  • Adverse Events
    • (8/20/21) Moderna vaccine has 2.5 times higher risk of myocarditis over Pfizer's shot. [295]
    • Leaked report: Moderna vendor reported that in a 3-month span, there were approximately 300,000 adverse event reports. [241]

GlaxoSmithKline

  • History
    • GlaxoSmithKline agreed to pay a fine of $3 billion to resolve civil and criminal liabilities regarding its promotion of drugs, as well as its failure to report safety data. This is the largest health care fraud settlement in the United States to date. The company pled guilty to misbranding the drug Paxil for treating depression in patients under 18, even though the drug had never been approved for that age group. GlaxoSmithKline also pled guilty to failing to disclose safety information about the diabetes drug Avandia to the FDA. [101]

Summary: What do you do when a "vaccine" formulation kills all the animals in animal tests? Skip the remaining animal tests and go right to human testing, of course (and even then, just avoid the standard ones run on humans). Tis better to be fast than safe, right?

 

  • Dr. Lee Merritt (re: animal studies): After mRNA injections have been administered to cats, when the virus arrived once again into the body, it arrived like a Trojan Horse, undetected by the cats’ own immune system. The virus multiplied unchallenged and all animals involved in the experiment died from various causes. [178]
  • An internationally recognized expert in the areas of pharmacokinetics, biopharmaceutics, drug dissolution testing, analytical chemistry as related to characterization of pharmaceuticals, and bioavailability/bioequivalence, with over 30 yrs. experience -- Dr. Saeed A. Qureshi, Ph.D. -- confirms that SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated. [75]
  • Skipped tests - COVID-19 injections are the only ones on record to have successfully cleared animal testing (actually, they started animal tests, but because they kept dying, manufacturers stopped the tests and moved to human trials). In other words, YOU ARE THE LAB RAT. [17]
  • Even with the lack of animal studies, in-depth human studies have not been conducted:
    • No drug interaction studies.
    • No single-dose toxicity studies.
    • No toxicokinetic studies.
    • No genotoxicity studies.
    • No carcinogenicity studies.
    • No studies on pregnant women.
    • No studies on pre-or post-natal development [18]
  • Childrens' study - 86% of children who participated in Pfizer COVID-19 injection trial experienced adverse reactions. [19]

Summary: PCR tests were long used as the standard testing regimen for the presence of COVID in a body. But science has shown that PCR tests are far, far from accurate, leading many to wonder just how many people were truly infected in the first place.

 

PCR Tests

Are still used in some countries

    • Australia's COVID-related decision-making is based on PCR tests which are run at 45 CT. [169]

Yet science says the PCR tests are misleading and shouldn't be used.

    • The CDC is withdrawing the PCR testing protocol because it was never accurate in the first place. [89]
    • 22 highly renowned scientists concluded that the PCR test produces 97% false positives. So out of all of the COVID-19 patients we've ever seen, 97% may never have had COVID-19. [20]
    • Positive PCR tests led to death rate artificial inflation -- The PCR testing that every country was advised by The WHO and CDC to use to diagnose covid has been found to produce up to 90% false positives. Sweden has stopped using this test to diagnose Covid19.  [107] [108]
    • PCR instruments have never been calibrated against physical covid reference materials. [126]
    • PCR instruments are incapable of quantitative analysis and cannot measure viral load. [127]

Swabs

  • PCR test rod (swab) particles can act like asbestos in the body
    • They are made of hard materials and contain a variety of (nano) particles made of silver, aluminium, titanium, glass fibres ect, many of which are undeclared in the package leaflet.
    • When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation (lesions).
    • Repeated swab testing can cause chronic lesions. The release of fragments of the brittle glassy fibers can cause biological reactions such as granulomas and / or fibrosis of the tissue.
    • ENT doctors are finding more hardened mucous membranes in people who are often tested for SARS-CoV-2.
    • Click here to see actual microscope images of these swabs. [229]
  • They are coated with ethelyne oxide, a known carcinogen.

Summary: Despite what your government is saying, science has proven that the injections' ARRs show negligible effectiveness at best.

Some say the jab is effective.

  • The FDA says of the newly-approved Pfizer-BioNTech "vaccine", "the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product." [285]
  • (8/6/21) CDC Director: "Vaccines work 'exceptionally well" [244]
  • Biden claims that getting jabbed will prohibit you from contracting COVID. [76]
  • In response to the Washington Post story (see below), Ben Wakana (Senior Member, White House Covid Response Team) Twittered:(Wakana provided no substantiation to his claim)

    (Wakana provided no substantiation to his claim)

The facts say otherwise.

  • (9/1/21) LA County Public Health Director: "[These] reflect the reality that the vaccines do not provide 100 percent protection. [With] these high rates of community transmission, more fully vaccinated people are getting post-vaccination infections." [334]
  • FDA: "it is not possible to assess sustained efficacy over a period longer than 2 months." [26]
  • People who've been jabbed can get and transmit more virulent, deadly viruses
    • (8/10/21) Study: Fully vaccinated healthcare workers carry 251 times viral load, pose threat to unvaccinated patients, co-workers [288]
      • Oxford University Clinical Research Group preprint paper, published in The Lancet, includes alarming findings devastating to the COVID vaccine rollout.
      • While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders.
      • The paper’s authors demonstrated widespread vaccine failure and transmission under tightly controlled circumstances in a hospital lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
        • Conclusion: Vaccinated individuals are blasting out concentrated viral explosions into their communities and fueling new COVID surges.
        • Vaccinated healthcare workers are almost certainly infecting their coworkers and patients, causing horrendous collateral damage.
    • 2015 Study: "Imperfect Vaccination can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens" (IOW, that which is not killed can become stronger)
      • "Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population."
      • "Here we show experimentally that immunization of chickens against Marek's disease virus enhances the fitness of more virulent strains, making it possible for hyperpathogenic strains to transmit."
      • "Immunity elicited by direct vaccination or by maternal vaccination prolongs host survival but does not prevent infection, viral replication or transmission, thus extending the infectious periods of strains otherwise too lethal to persist."
      • "Our data show that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts." [191]
    • (8/5/21) CNN Medical Analyst Dr. Leana Wen: “New data suggests that fully vaccinated individuals are not just contracting COVID, but could be carrying higher levels of virus than previously understood, facilitating spread.” [187]
    • Example: Massachusetts
      • Health officials argue that vaccinated people make up only a small fraction of the seriously ill. Critics counter that CDC’s recent Massachusetts data calls that into question. [224]
      • (7/30/21) Washington Post: "Pivotal CDC study: Vaccinated people made up 3/4 of those infected in a massive Massachusetts covid-19 outbreak. Critically, the study found that vaccinated individuals carried as much virus in their noses as unvaccinated individuals, and that vaccinated people could spread the virus to each other. Scientists said the Provincetown outbreak and other recent data on breakthrough infections make clear that the vaccines do work, as hoped, against severe illness and death, but do not offer blanket protection against any chance of infection." See the CDC's report here: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w [173]

      • (7/28/21) “CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said recent studies had shown that those vaccinated individuals who do become infected with Covid have just as much viral load as the unvaccinated, making it possible for them to spread the virus to others.” [186]
    • Understand Absolute Risk Reduction
      • It's important to understand "the absolute risk reduction. That’s simply the difference in risk for someone in the treatment group versus someone in the control group.
      • Here’s an example: Say you have 100 people who don’t get a vaccine, and you find that 10 of them catch the disease. So the baseline risk of getting it is 10%. And suppose that 100 other people get the vaccine, and only one of these gets sick. Their risk is 1%. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) is then just 9% (10% minus 1%), because the risk was already pretty low. But the relative risk reduction (RRR) is 90%—that reduction of 9% divided by the baseline risk of 10%. [167]
      • As a commentary in Lancet Microbe pointed out last month, even with trials on tens of thousands of people, the absolute risk reductions in Covid-19 vaccine trials are teensy-tiny—a reduction in the risk of getting severe Covid of just 1.2% for Moderna and a scant 0.84% for Pfizer. “One of the main reasons why absolute risk reduction is not shown is because of the numbers. If you say, ‘It’s 95% effective’—wow!” says Piero Olliaro, an infectious disease researcher at the University of Oxford’s Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health and one of the authors of the Lancet Microbe article. “But if your absolute risk reduction is like 0.8% or whatever it was, so what?”" [167]
      • "ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs:
        • 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford
        • 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH
        • 1·2% for the J&J
        • 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and
        • 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines." [168]
    • Understand Antibody Levels
      • (8/24/21) Study of 245 people published in medRxiv: [292]
        • Antibody levels in unvaccinated individuals after infection extended to ten months (around 300 days) after infection.
        • Pfizer or Moderna vaccines: Antibody responses peaked at around 40 days post-vaccination, with levels beginning to decline after 120 days.
        • Further tests will need to be conducted to determine whether the antibody response levels continue to decline or remain at a level similar to recovered individuals.

"Breakthrough" Cases

  • Many who have already been jabbed still get COVID-19. [24]
  • Examples
    • (9/16/21) Cornell University
      • It has a strict vaccine mandate. [460]
      • Has a 95% FULL vaccination rate [460]
      • The mandate has done little to control infections at the school [460]
      • COVID-19 cases are spiking. [460]
      • The shots are not stopping the virus from spreading. [460]
    • (8/10/21) Fully vaccinated man died of COVID-19, daughter said he was cautious [251]
  • By country
    • United States
      • (6/26/21) CDC says 4,115 fully vaccinated have been hospitalized or died with breakthrough covid-19 infections [21]
      • Biden's own administration advises against traveling to high vaccination countries because of surging Covid outbreaks there. [131]
      • Most new COVID-19 cases in California are occurring in the most vaccinated counties [130]
      • Red Cross
        • (6/12/21) Red Cross issues warning to stop blood plasma donations from vaccinated people [336]
          If you receive any type of COVID-19 vaccine, you are not eligible to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross. [336]
        • (7/28/21) "One of the Red Cross requirements for plasma from routine blood and platelet donations that test positive for high-levels of antibodies to be used as convalescent plasma is that it must be from a donor that has not received a COVID-19 vaccine. This is to ensure that antibodies collected from donors have sufficient antibodies directly related to their immune response to a COVID-19 infection and not just the vaccine, as antibodies from an infection and antibodies from a vaccine are not the same." [337]
      • Los Angeles
        • In Los Angeles, breakthrough infections are now 30% of all new Covid cases amid Delta surge [299]
        • That's up from 2% in March, 2021 and 20% in June, 2021 [299]
    • Israel
      • (9/14/21) Israel stands as greatest proof that COVID-19 vaccine experiment is a massive failure. [449]
      • (9/9/21) Israel: 80% of adults are vaccinated, [409] but infections are still spiking. [410]
      • (8/16/21) “Israel has among the world’s highest levels of vaccination for COVID-19, with 78% of those 12 and older fully vaccinated, the vast majority with the Pfizer vaccine. Yet the country is now logging one of the world’s highest infection rates, with nearly 650 new cases daily per million people. More than half are in fully vaccinated people.” [504]
      • (8/11/21) Israel’s Ministry of Health: 694 people were being treated in hospitals because of coronavirus (COVID-19) – including 400 patients in serious condition. [252]
        • Among those in serious condition, 64% were fully vaccinated while 32% were not. This means that there were twice as many fully vaccinated people in serious condition because of the disease compared to those who’re not vaccinated. [252]
      • (8/6/21) 95% of severe patients in Israeli hospitals are vaccinated. “85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people.” “The effectiveness of the vaccine is waning/fading out” and forcing hospitals to open up more COVID wards to deal with severe illness. [230]
      • (8/6/21) “85-90% of the hospitalizations are in fully vaccinated people.” He warns that “the effectiveness of the vaccine is waning/fading out” and forcing hospitals to open up more COVID wards to deal with severe illness. [231]
      • (7/22/21) Israel’s Health Ministry recently said effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has fallen to 40% [223]
      • Israel (the most vaccinated country in the world) HALF of all new “delta” infections are occurring in “fully vaccinated” people. [171]
      • (7/18/21): Israeli Health Ministry -- Israelis who were jabbed were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection. [64], [221]
    • United Kingdom
      • Death Rate
        • (6/18/21) Public Health England: The death rate from the Delta variant is over six times higher among those who were fully vaccinated for two weeks or longer than among those who never received a shot. [253]
        • This equates to a death rate of 0.00636%, which is 6.6 times higher than the rate of 0.000957% deaths, or 34 deaths among 35,521 positive Delta cases among the unvaccinated. [253]
        • Both death rates among the unvaccinated and vaccinated are exceedingly low (less than one percent of all positive tests) for a variant that Public Health England describes as the “dominant variant” in the UK. [253]
      • Hospitalization Rate
        • Fully vaccinated people are being hospitalized in the UK at a higher rate than unvaccinated people.[254]
        • According to most recent technical briefing report, public health data show that 2% percent of vaccinated individuals (84 of 4,087) who tested positive for the Delta variant were admitted to hospital (including those tested upon entering the hospital for any other reason) compared with 1.48% of unvaccinated individuals (527 of 35,521). [254]
      • (8/25/21) UK study: Covid protection for the fully vaccinated is waning
        • A U.K. study of over 400,000 people who had received both shots of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine found its effectiveness fell to 74% five or six months after receiving both doses. [505]
        • An analysis of over 700,000 people who had received both doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine showed its effectiveness fell to 67% after four to five months. [505]
        • Pfizer Vaxx Down to ‘16% Efficacy Against Symptomatic Infection’ in Israel [505]
        • “Data published by Israel in July, showed that the Pfizer vaccine was just 16% effective against symptomatic infection for those individuals who received two doses in January.” [505]
      • (8/6/21) Figures from Public Health England say 55% of people hospitalised with the delta variant were unvaccinated, while nearly 35% had received two doses of a vaccine. [234]
      • UK chief science advisor admits that 60% of people admitted to UK hospitals are “fully vaccinated” [73]
      • There is an 85% increase of COVID cases among the jabbed. The jab does NOT prevent infection or transmission by the infected, and by that standard, is not technically a vaccine. [71]
    • Singapore
      • (9/13/21) It has already reached 81% vaccination rate (ages 12+; one of the fastest in the world to reach that level of compliance). [459]
      • Still seeing chronic illness explosion [459]
      • The number of patients requiring oxygen doubled [459]
      • Is now considering a third shot for younger adults and may start inoculating children early next year. [459]
      • Teams are going to the homes of unvaccinated elderly people to give them the shots. [459]
      • (7/23/21) "75% Of New Covid Cases In Singapore Already Got The Jab" [232]
    • Gibraltar
      • (7/30/21) Covid cases have increased by 2,500% per day, despite the nation having a 99 percent vaccination rate. [233]
    • Iceland
      • (7/27/21) Where nearly the ENTIRE adult population is fully vaccinated, is setting daily records for new infections, mostly among the vaccinated. [235]
    • Scotland
      • (9/14/21) 80% of Covid deaths in Scotland are occurring among VACCINATED residents. [451]
    • Other
      • Royal Caribbean discovered that jabs cause outbreaks after eight jabbed crew members tested POSITIVE for COVID-19. [23]

Children

  • Death rate: ZERO or incredibly low
    • U.S.
      • Johns Hopkins University professor Dr. Marty Makary: An analysis of health insurance data from 48,000 children under 18 who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 between April to August 2020 found that the death rate from COVID among healthy kids without preexisting medical conditions remains at zero. [256]
      • Makary said that while the CDC claims 335 children under the age of 18 have died after being diagnosed with COVID-19, the agency hasn’t “researched each death to find out whether COVID [indeed] caused it or if it involved a pre-existing medical condition.” [256]
      • Study: U.S. COVID-19 deaths per 100,000 (ages 5-14 years) is 0.16 [180] -- far less than cancer (2.1), suicide (1.0), homicide (0.7), birth defects (0.8), heart disease (0.5) and flu (0.2). [181]
      • Study of 258,790 kids age 5-17: Long COVID uncommon in children (Note: long-since discredited PCR testing was used in the testing) [179]
    • U.K.
      • A study of hospital admissions and deaths reported for people younger than 18 in England found that COVID-19 caused 25 deaths in that age group between March 2020 and February 2021. [257]
      • About half of those deaths were in individuals with an underlying complex disability with high health-care needs, such as tube feeding or assistance with breathing. [257]
      • Need for intensive care: "incredibly rare"
      • A study of hospital admissions and deaths reported for people younger than 18 in England found that COVID-19 caused 25 deaths in that age group between March 2020 and February 2021. [257]
      • Overall, the need for intensive care was “incredibly rare” among these patients, says study author Joseph Ward of the University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health. [257]
    • Injection manufacturers ignore low rates, want to jab kids anyway
      • (9/20/12) Pfizer says its Covid vaccine is safe and generates robust immune response in kids ages 5 to 11. [507]
        • The shots produced an immune response and side effects comparable to those seen in a study of people ages 16 to 25. [507]
        • The companies didn't disclose many details about the trial, including whether any of the kids in the trial experienced myocarditis, a rare heart condition seen in a small number of adolescents and young adults. [507]

TREATMENT

Summary: National governments keep saying you're safe if you take the jab. But an overwhelming number of VAERS and social media submissions blow that claim right out of the water.

Submit your own Adverse Event to VAERS here.

According to Biden, there are no adverse effects after you get the jab.

  • (7/22/21): Biden: "I'll respond to the COVID question: 'We follow the science. If you are vaccinated, you are safe." [164]

But the science -- and even the manufacturers -- say otherwise:

  • Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson is logging all known cases of Covid-19 “vaccine” injury and death in a running list on her website (here). [443]
  • Dr. Ryan Cole -- A pathologist details injection adverse events:
    • With most vaccines, pathology approaches vaccine deaths as "Guilty until proven innocent." But this ONE time, it's different. "Just ignore the adverse effects. These aren't the droids you're looking for." Where's the science in that?
    • Where are all the autopsies to prove the science?
    • Where is all the long-term safety data? What's the risk for cancer, autoimmune disease, impaired fertility? Then why are we going forward willy-nilly without these facts?
    • Scientists have found that the spike protein introduces the same adverse effects as Covid-19. The spike IS the toxin.
    • Lung damage -- the photo to the left indicates severe post-injection inflammation
    • Because the injection contents cross the blood-brain barrier, it has the potential to cause severe neurological inflammation and adverse events.
    • Scans of post-shot juvenile hearts show severe damage and scarring (heart cells do not heal, so the heart says in a damaged state).
    • Scans of post-shot juvenile kidneys, liver, testes, ovaries -- same thing.
    • Pfizer paperwork -- 16% decrease in rat fertility.
    • D-dimer (micro-clots) are prevalent.
    • He has seen a 10-20-fold increase in uterine cancers. This is likely because many of the processes which keep cancer in check are deactivated by the shot. For how long? We don't know. [238]
  • Europe's drug regulator: Erythema multiforme (a form of allergic skin reaction), glomerulonephritis (or kidney inflammation) and nephrotic syndrome (a renal disorder characterised by heavy urinary protein losses) are being studied as possible Pfizer and Moderna injection side effects. [255]
  • Covid-19 “Vaccine” Analysis: The most common adverse events reported so far [88]
  • Israeli People Committee’s Report Find Catastrophic Side Effects of Pfizer jab to Every System in Human Body [74]
  • There is a long list of safety concerns and adverse side effects. [29, 30]
  • Click here to see Pfizer admit “that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) and Molecular Mimicry

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE)

    • Also known as “Pathogenic Priming,” is a phenomenon in which a disease is made worse or more severe in a person who was already exposed to the virus through a previous infection or vaccination compared to people who were never exposed or vaccinated.

Molecular Mimicry

    • This is one explanation for autoimmune diseases. After infection with a microorganism whose surface contains antigens similar to those found in the body, the immune system may respond inappropriately by trying to damage these cells with similar surface antigens in otherwise healthy joints, blood vessels or organs.
    • “COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralizing antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.”  [96]
    • The elicitation of antibodies, specifically neutralising antibodies, is the goal of nearly every current SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate. The prior evidence that vaccine elicited, antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is likely to occur to some degree with COVID-19 vaccines is vertically consistent from controlled SARS studies in primates to clinical observations in SARS and COVID-19. Thus, a finite, non-theoretical risk is evident in the medical literature that vaccine candidates composed of the SARS-CoV-2 viral spike and eliciting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, be they neutralising or not, place vaccinees at higher risk for more severe COVID-19 disease when they encounter circulating viruses.”
    • In some viruses, if a person harbors a non-neutralizing antibody to the virus, a subsequent infection by the virus can cause that person to elicit a more severe reaction to the virus due to the presence of the non-neutralizing antibody. This is not true for all viruses, only particular ones. This is called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), and is a common problem with Dengue Virus, Ebola Virus, HIV, RSV, and the family of coronaviruses. In fact, this problem of ADE is a major reason why many previous vaccine trials for other coronaviruses failed. Major safety concerns were observed in animal models. If ADE occurs in an individual, their response to the virus can be worse than their response if they had never developed an antibody in the first place. This can cause a hyperinflammatory response, a cytokine storm, and a generally dysregulation of the immune system that allows the virus to cause more damage to our lungs and other organs of our body”.  [97]
    • “There are concerns that a COVID-19 vaccine could cause antibody dependent enhancement on exposure to challenge or community exposure to the virus.”  [98]
    • Vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease, “COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated” The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.” [99]
    • The mRNA vaccinations aim to provide immunity against the so-called ‘spike protein’ portion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, whereas natural infection in non-vaccinated individuals provides protection against many parts of the virus. Worryingly, there are now concerns that the spike protein may in fact be the most pathogenic part of the virus and until these concerns are properly investigated, it seems entirely reckless to be rolling this out to parts of the population who are at incredibly low risk from the virus itself. [100]
    • “Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non-theoretical and compelling risk for COVID-19 vaccines and the “laundry list” nature of informed consents, disclosure of the specific risk of worsened COVID-19 disease from vaccination calls for a specific, separate, informed consent form and demonstration of patient comprehension in order to meet medical ethics standards. The informed consent process for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials does not appear to meet this standard. While the COVID-19 global health emergency justifies accelerated vaccine trials of candidates with known liabilities, such an acceleration is not inconsistent with additional attention paid to heightened informed consent procedures specific to COVID-19 vaccine risks.” [99]

Blood Clots

  • (8/25/21) Peer-reviewed study: AstraZeneca "vaccine" causes “devastating” blood clots [291], [294]
    • Massachusetts Medical Society researchers studies 220 cases as either “definite” or “probable” cases of blood clotting (vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, or VITT).
    • All 220 recognized cases had received the first dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.
    • 41% of the patients with recognized VITT were diagnosed with no underlying health conditions (they were perfectly healthy before they received the AstraZeneca shot).
    • The overall mortality rate for the 220 recognized VITT cases was 22%.
  • Post-vaccine horror: Blood clot victims develop severe headache, pain, then shortness of breath just 6 days after J&J vaccination [129]
  • Euro Study: Clot Risk To 18-39s From AstraZeneca jab Is TWICE As High As Covid Death Risk [72]
  • Scientists around the world are discovering that the COVID-19 jabs are causing injection recipients to develop deadly blood clots. [35]
  • “This study identified an increased incidence of blood clots in the veins (venous blood clots), including a slightly increased incidence of blood clots in the veins of the brain, corresponding to one additional such clot per 40,000 vaccine recipients. “ [53]

Brain damage

  • Study: mRNA COVID-19 shots may progressively degenerate your brain from prion disease. [239]

Cancer

  • (9/14/21) Idaho doctor reports "20 times increase" in cancer among those "vaccinated" for Covid. [453]

Contracting COVID-19

  • Pfizer trial on FDA site shows that 60% more people got COVID-19 in vaccinated group vs. placebo group: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group. It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.” [103]
  • In all highly vaccinated countries, the mortality recorded during the two months after vaccination is equal to or exceeds that of the whole of 2020.
  • Nepal saw daily cases rise from 350/ day to 8000/day once vaccination began.   [104]
  • Columbia has seen daily infections quadruple and daily mortality’s multiplied by 3.   [104]
  • * Chile had the highest vaccination rate in South America and their daily infection and death rate and increase 3x since the vaccination champagne began.   [104]
  • Thailand’s infection rate has increased 5 times and deaths 9 times. In two and a half months.   [104]
  • Hungary has doubled its figures of infected (400,000 to 800,000) and deaths (from 14,000 to 29,000) reached after 11 months of epidemic.   [104]
  • Monaco, a country of 38,000 inhabitants, had only 3 deaths before vaccination and 32 since vaccination.   [104]
  • All of Gibraltar’s 34,000 inhabitants were vaccinated followed by an 800% increase in mortality from 10 to 94).  [104]
  • Seychelles, which has vaccinated more of its population against COVID-19 than any other country in the world, saw active cases more than double in the week to May 7.  [105]

Convulsions

  • Video of three women who suffered from violent convulsions within a day of receiving the jab. [190]

Death

  • Here's a near-realtime data dashboard of Covid cases and deaths worldwide and by country.
    (6/25/21) European Union reports 1.5 million injection injuries, 15,472 Deaths [329]
    • From the total of injuries recorded, half of them (753,657) are serious injuries. [329]
  • Top German pathologist: 30-40% of autopsies of deceased vaxxed died from the vaccination
    • Peter Schirmacher (director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg) has carried out over forty autopsies on people who had died within two weeks of their vaccination. Schirmacher expressed alarm over his findings.
    • “Schirmacher assumes that 30 to 40 percent of them died from the vaccination."
    • "In his opinion, the frequency of fatal consequences of vaccinations is underestimated.”
    • The pathologist cited “rare, severe side effects of the vaccination – such as cerebral vein thrombosis or autoimmune diseases”.
    • The Federal Association of German Pathologists stated that more autopsies of vaccinated people who died within a certain time frame after vaccination should be performed. [189]
  • Official Report: 94% of all Canadians who died of COVID-19 in 2020 were seniors older than 65. Of those, more than half were over 85 years of age, and the majority were residents of long-term care homes. [188]
  • At least 25,000 deaths from the jab. The OpenVAERS team thinks it is over 20,000 due to under reporting. But an analysis of the CMS database indicates VAERS is under-reporting by 5X. And the CDC excess unexplained deaths are 25,000 as well. [27] It matches up. [28]
  • Dr. Charles Hoffe, M.D.: The vast majority of people who are getting injected for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) will die within a few short years from heart failure. [65]
  • Former Pfizer exec: Children are 50 times more likely to die from coronavirus jab than from the virus itself. [62]
  • The first autopsy of COVID-19-injected patient (2 weeks after injection) found viral RNA in every organ of body. This means the injection either doesn't work or causes the spread of SARS-CoV-2 faster throughout the body. [47]
  • A leading vaccinologist, Geert Vanden Bossche, said:
    • The COVID-19 injection may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we are accelerating its ability to mutate and become more deadly.
    • The COVID-19 injections may be creating injection-resistant viruses (similar to antibiotic resistant bacteria).
    • Because of previous problems with Antibody Dependent Enhancement, we may be looking at a mass casualty event in the next few months/years.

  • Dr. Christiane Northrup - We'll start seeing deaths within 6-9 months of getting the jab. [48]
  • Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier - "All Vaccinated People Will Die Within 2 Years" [49]
  • A future virus "more deadly" than COVID-19 is coming. [50]
  • Businesses are already preparing to replace jabbed employees within 3 years. [51]

Eye Disorders

  • Hundreds of cases of blindness are among the 19,916 reports of “eye disorders” to the World Health Organization’s European drug monitoring agency following injection of experimental COVID-19 vaccines. The nearly 20,000 eye disorders reported to VigiBase, a database for the WHO maintained by the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) in Uppsalla, Sweden, include: Blindness, Visual Impairment, pain, swelling, haemorrahage etc.  [91]

Graves Disease

  • Studies in Mexico and Turkey link the autoimmune thyroid disorder Graves disease to Covid-19 vaccination in numerous female health care workers, including two who were breastfeeding. Pfizer-BioNTech was the vaccine given in Mexico. A Chinese vaccine was given in Turkey. [227]

Guillain-Barre syndrome

  • (7/22/21) The European Union added Guillain-Barré syndrome, an autoimmune paralysis disorder, as a possible side effect from Johnson and Johnson's Covid-19 vaccine. [226]

Increased sensitivity to more severe disease

  • "Vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not jabbed. This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of the risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials." (International Journal of Clinical Practice, March 2021) [31]

Magnetism

  • Why is it that those who've been jabbed are suddenly magnetic, and those who haven't been jabbed aren't? Not even the fact checkers can explain away this...[68]
  • Injection sites on injection recipients are mysteriously magnetized even a month after the jab (I have interviewed the participants of this video; it's legit).

Male infertility

  • COVID-19 injections attack male fertility. [36]

Menstrual Irregularities

  • “Covid19 post-vaccine menorrhagia, metrorrhagia or postmenopausal bleeding and potential risk of vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia in women. Many women across the world after receiving Covid vaccines are complaining of irregularities in their menstrual bleeding; some experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia), some bleeding before their periods were due or bleeding frequently (metrorrhagia/polymenorrhea), whereas some are complaining of postmenopausal bleeding.” [123]

Miscarriage

  • Study: Out of 827 pregnant women who got the jab, 115 (13.9%) had “spontaneous abortions” [59]
  • New England Journal of Medicine study: COVID-19 jab terminates 4 out of 5 pregnancies via "spontaneous abortions." [38]
  • Fetal death from exposure to Covid19 Vaccine through mother's breast milk: As of 5/22/21 there's a total of 283 adverse reports in VAERS where the symptom is either "spontaneous abortion" or "fetal death". Of these, 9.54% are attributed to J&J/Janssen, 36.75% to Moderna and 53.71% to Pfizer BioNTech. These events are occurring very close to the time of vaccination, and subsequently falling off as time progresses. This is suggestive of a causative link between the vaccination and the adverse event. Nearly 30% of these events occurred within 0-2 days after vaccination. [95]

Multi-Organ damage

  • “It is important to consider the possibility that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein produced by the new COVID-19 vaccines trigger cell signaling events that promote pulmonary hypertension, other cardiovascular complications, and/or complications in other tissues/organs in certain individuals. We will need to monitor carefully the long-term consequences of COVID-19 vaccines that introduce the spike protein into the human body.” [122]
  • "Research obtained by a group of scientists shows the COVID-19 jab spike protein can travel from the injection site and accumulate in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in "quite high concentrations" in the ovaries." [33, 34]
  • COVID-19 mRNA injections instruct your cells to clog your blood with protein prions that inflame the heart while suffocating the brain. [37]
  • Pfizer study: Vaccine predominately goes to the blood, spleen and ovaries.  [106]

Myocarditis

  • (9/9/21) Study: Teenage boys are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems after being jabbed than be hospitalised from Covid-19
    • Last week, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) delivered its long-awaited verdict, saying the "margin of benefit" of jabbing 12- to 15-year-olds was "considered too small" and citing the low risk to healthy children from the virus. [411]
    • Don't believe it? Check out this video of a Division 1 student athlete with no prior health issues speaks from his hospital bed about his post-jab myocarditis, encouraging all to research the adverse effects.:

    • A team led by Dr Tracy Hoeg at the University of California investigated the rate of cardiac myocarditis - heart inflammation - and chest pain in children aged 12-17 following their second dose of the vaccine. [411]
    • They then compared this with the likelihood of children needing hospital treatment owing to Covid-19, at times of low, moderate and high rates of hospitalisation. [411]
    • Researchers found that the risk of heart complications for boys aged 12-15 following the vaccine was 162.2 per million, which was the highest out of all the groups they looked at. [411]
    • Meanwhile, the risk of a healthy boy needing hospital treatment owing to Covid-19 in the next 120 days is 26.7 per million. This means the risk they face from heart complications is 6.1 times higher than that of hospitalisation. [411]
  • (8/20/21) Moderna vaccine has 2.5 times higher risk of myocarditis over Pfizer's shot. [295]
    • Males under 30 appear to be the most at risk of developing the side effect with either vaccination.
  • CDC Knows Vaccine Associated Critical Illness And Myocarditis Are Linked To Prior COVID-19 Infections [102], [237]
  • (8/4/21) A new, independent study of medical records found the incidences of myocarditis and pericarditis are more than five times more common than CDC reported. [225]
  • "Vaccinated" young men are showing incidences of myocarditis at 25 times the normal rate, meaning more young people may be injured or die by the injection, not the disease itself. Germany is now telling young people not to get the injection, because it's too dangerous. [39]

Neurological Disorders

    • The COVID-19 vaccine may precipitate the development of functional neurological disorder (FND), a neuropsychiatric disorder with symptoms such as limb weakness, gait problems, jerky movements, tremor and facial spasms.  [92]

Facial Paralysis

      • During the pivotal phase 3 clinical trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, several cases of facial paralysis were observed in the vaccine groups (7 of 35 654) On March 9, 2021, among the 133,883 cases of adverse drug reactions reported with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, we identified a total of 844 (0.6%) facial paralysis-related events, including 683 cases of facial paralysis, 168 cases of facial paresis, 25 cases of facial spasms, and 13 cases of facial nerve disorders. A total of 749 cases were reported with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and 95 cases were reported with the Moderna vaccine. [93]

Bell’s Palsy

    • (8/21/21) Vaccinated Australian Minister Develops Bell’s Palsy on Live Televised COVID-19 Press Conference [275]
    • The observed incidence of Bell's palsy in the vaccine arms is between 3·5-times and 7-times higher than would be expected in the general population. This finding signals a potential safety phenomenon and suggests inaccurate reporting of basic epidemiological context to the public.  [94]

Rashes

  • Another person developed mysterious rashes all over their body…2 weeks after injection.
  • It's no wonder Australia's government calls the COVID-19 jab a "poison". [40]

Shingles

  • “Little has been known about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines among patients with rheumatic diseases, because immunosuppressed individuals were not included in the initial clinical trials, they explained. "Potential mechanisms that might explain the pathogenetic link between mRNA-COVID-19 vaccination and herpes zoster reactivation are related to stimulation of innate immunity through toll-like receptors," the researchers wrote. They also noted that the vaccine can stimulate type I interferons and cytokines that can interfere with antigen expression.” [54]

Thrombosis

  • “In this large binational cohort study of recipients of the Oxford-AstraZeneca covid 19 vaccine (ChAdOx1-S) aged 18-65 years, results were reassuring for most cardiovascular and haemostatic outcomes. We did, however, observe an increased rate of venous thromboembolic events, corresponding to 11 excess venous thromboembolic events per 100 000 vaccinations and including a clearly increased rate of cerebral venous thrombosis with 7 observed events versus 0.3 expected events among the 282,572 vaccine recipients (excess of 2.5 per 100,000 vaccinations, or one in 40,000 vaccine recipients). “  [1]
  • “Vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca) can result in the rare development of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia mediated by platelet-activating antibodies against PF4, which clinically mimics autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.” [52]

Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

  • The pictures are appalling and horrific: One woman (who took the Pfizer jab a week before) experienced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, which doctors have attributed to the vaccine. She had "no previous medical history." [284]

Summary: Accurate reporting? Not with this pandemic. Not even close. (Also cross-reference to the inaccurate PCR tests). 

  • (9/12/21) North Carolina senior doctors and a hospital marketing director discussed inflating COVID-19 numbers by counting recovered patients as active COVID patients. "We need to be... more scary to the public... If you don't get vaccinated, you know you're going to die." [444]
  • (8/27/21) Release of VAERS data
    • Teens injected with COVID shots have 7.5 times more deaths, 15 times more disabilities, 44 times more hospitalizations than all FDA approved vaccines in 2021. [503]
    • There have been 13,911 deaths, 2,933,377 injury symptoms, 18,098 permanent disabilities, 76,160 ER visits, 56,912 hospitalizations, and 14,327 life threatening events recorded following experimental COVID-19 “vaccinations.” [503]
    • There have now been more than twice as many deaths recorded following COVID-19 shots during the past 9 months since the COVID-19 shots were given emergency use authorization, than deaths recorded following ALL vaccines for the past 30 years. [503]
    • COVID-19 shots given to our teenagers have 7.5x more deaths, 15x more disabilities, and 44x more hospitalizations than all other FDA-approved vaccines COMBINED that these teenagers are receiving. [503]
    • A search for ALL cases of “thrombosis” (blood clots), for both COVID shots and for all other vaccines = cases of blood clots were 28 x higher among teens injected with COVID-19 than for teens injected with all other vaccines during the same time period. [503]
  • Harvard Study: VAERS numbers are grossly inaccurate
    • According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of the U.S. Government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) – read page 6 at the link. [352]
    • If those numbers are still only 1% of the total adverse reactions (or .8 to 2% of what this study published recently in the JAMA found), you can do the math, but that equates to somewhere around 110,00 to 220,000 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions. [353]
    • To bloat the number even more, both the W.H.O. and the C.D.C. changed their guidelines such that those who are suspected or probable (but were never confirmed) of having died of Covid, are also included in the death numbers. [354]
  • According to the CDCs own numbers, (scroll down to the section “Comorbidities and other conditions”) only 6% of the deaths being attributed to Covid are instances where Covid seems to be the only issue at hand. [355]
  • Leaked report: Moderna vendor reported that in a 3-month span, there were approximately 300,000 adverse event reports. [241]
  • (8/9/21) Some medical experts have said they’re confounded by public health officials' failure to factor natural and virus-acquired immunity into the Covid equation. [222]
  • Inflated Covid death numbers in the U.S. revised downward. Alameda County, CA reduced its Covid death toll by 25% after state public-health officials insisted that deaths be attributed to Covid only if the virus was a direct or contributing factor. [166]
  • The CDC has stopped counting jab deaths to blame all Covid cases on the unjabbed. [78], [289]
    • The agency’s decision to limit its reporting of breakthrough cases has prompted wide variation in how states keep tabs on them, and ultimately, produce inconsistent data.
    • "having a fuller picture of breakthrough cases no matter what the level of symptoms is important to be able to decide what rules and mitigation strategies you need to put in place in your community"
  • A healthcare data analyst/expert (specializing in healthcare fraud detection with 25 years experience), is launching a lawsuit against the Secretary of HHS. [69] He says the death count within 3 days of a COVID-19 injection is underreported by VAERS by a factor of 5. [70]
  • High death and adverse effects count: Between July 1, 1997 and the end of 2013 (15.5 years), there were 2,149 deaths reported in the U.S. for all jabs combined on the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Reporting System). Yet in just the last 6 months, there have been more than 5,160 deaths associated with the COVID-19 injections. That's more than double the amount of deaths in 1/10the the time. How do you explain that? [39]
  • The death count is significant: The death count for the first four-and-a-half months of COVID-19 jabs is now higher than that of all jabs given in the U.S. from 1999 through 2020. [41]
  • According to an exasperated Dr. Peter McCullough (Professor of Medicine, Texas A & M College of Medicine), it normally takes only 25-50 deaths to shut down a jab program (go to 14:30 mark in video). [42]
  • (3/24/20) To stoke fear, the CDC inflated the death rate for COVID-19 by instructing medical practitioners in a directive to ascribe the cause of death as COVID-19 for all deaths, irrespective if patients had tested positive for COVID-19 or if they had other comorbidities, on the mere assumption they could have been infected. Here is the document.
  • VAERS counts grossly understate the true number of adverse effects. For example, Houston Methodist Hospital ordered its staff to withhold adverse reactions caused by COVID-19 injections from official records. [46]
  • Unlike the U.S.'s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), date sent to the U.K.'s Yellow Card scheme can be added to by anyone, whether a clinician or a member of the public. The U.K.’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans. However, COVID-related deaths or any adverse events reported through the Yellow Card scheme are not attributed to vaccination. THE MHRA's response is basically "Big deal. So what." [170]

Summary: For those in the health care field, it's either "take the jab," or "resign," "be fired" or maybe even "be charged with a crime."

  • Nursing: The challenges facing the Nursing industry are formidable and not going away.
    • Many nurses haven’t gotten the vaccine or don’t plan to, despite having had access to the shots for almost nine months.
      • (8/26/21) The American Nurses Association surveyed 4,9122 American nurses. [420]
        • Almost 1 in 9 haven’t gotten the vaccine [420]
        • Among those who haven't been vaccinated: [420]
          • 72% say they want to wait until there is more data on safety. [420]
          • 51% are unsure if it's necessary. [420]
          • 48% have already had Covid and recovered without issue (IOW, they have immunity) [420]
      • (8/1/21) 50-state survey by the The Covid States Project of over 20,000 healthcare workers: 20% are vaccine resistant. [421]
      • (9/13/21) One multi-state healthcare executive: About half of his frontline nurses who treat COVID every day have received the COVID vaccination; the other 50% of those nurses have refused. [422]
        • These are people who treat COVID for a living. You can't dismiss them as uninformed, they know more than virtually anyone in the world about the subject, but they've refused the vaccine. Why? No one has answered that question [422]
      • (8/11/21) In NSW, Almost one in five clinical staff in the state’s public health system has not received a single dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. [423]
    • Hospitals are already struggling keeping nurses
      • (8/6/21) After a year and a half of treating Covid patients, burnout is high. Almost 30% of front-line health-care workers have considered leaving their profession as a result of the pandemic. [424]
      • (8/6/21) Industry expert: “There are not enough nurses to go around. That is clear. Even with replacements and backfills and travels, there are still not enough.” [424]
      • (8/12/21) Houston hospital requiring all employees to get the jab now likely faces a different challenge -- a dramatic nurse shortage. [280]
    • Mandates make it tougher to keep nurses
      • (9/8/21) National Rural Health Association: It's going to be a real challenge for small, rural hospitals to mandate a vaccine when they're already facing such significant workforce shortages. [425]
      • (9/10/21) Mandates are likely to convince some workers to roll up their sleeves for shots, but others will walk away if they have other career options or feel deeply that this infringes on their liberty. That could lead to shortages of support staff in some facilities. [426]
      • (9/13/21) The Michigan Nurses Association remains opposed to mandates, saying they will drive vaccine-hesitant nurses to quit rather than submit to inoculation. The union contends such decisions are "best decided democratically by health care workers themselves and need to be subject to collective bargaining." [427]
      • (9/12/21) A rural New York hospital had to stop delivering babies because staffers quit over New York's vaccine mandate. [428]
      • (9/2/21) Healthcare administrators are warning the New York State Department of Health that they'll lose significant percentages of their healthcare workers once jab mandates go into effect. Governing boards are standing firm on the mandates but are exploring exemptions in case the worker shortages get too severe. Administrators are countering, saying by then it'll be too late -- the workers would have already been long gone (video -- watch the last 7 minutes). [339]
      • (8/20/21) Other hospitals are struggling after requiring medical staff to get the jab. [281]
    • Here's a video from the "Patriot Nurse" with at least two key take-aways:
      • Nurses are pressured not to leave or resign their jobs, lest they be charged with "Patient Abandonment."
      • Nevertheless, they are seeing such horrendous actions taken by doctors, that, she believes, we will soon see a spike in nurse resignations.
    • Biden's proposed mandates bring several problems.
      • (8/26/21) Nursing administrators face a dilemma: Mandate the vaccine, and some nurses will quit. Don't mandate the vaccine, and some nurses will get sick, rendering them unable to work. [424]
      • (9/14/21) The Minnesota Nurses Union responded to Biden's mandates, saying, “We question the timing of the impending vaccine mandates and believe these mandates will continue to exacerbate staffing shortages.” [429]
      • (9/14/21) A federal judge temporarily blocked the state of New York on Tuesday from forcing medical workers to be vaccinated after a group of health care workers sued, saying their constitutional rights were violated because the state’s mandate disallowed religious exemptions. [430]
      • (9/14/21) One nurse applied for a religious exemption, and if she doesn’t get it, she’s ready to quit. [431]
  • Doctors
    • A devastating vantage point as told by a General Practitioner [328]
    • About 10,000 health care workers in Greece have not received the jab. They are in jeopardy of losing their jobs due to new regulations which go into effect on Sept. 1 [300]
    • Federation of State Medical Boards: Physicians who post COVID-19 vaccine misinformation may lose license. [2]
      • Who gets to decide what's "misinformation?"
      • One could cite many examples of where the status quo was wrong (misinformation was later proved true).
      • If you're going to claim that medicine is a "science," you must allow dissent. Science isn't static.
    • Even doctors are running away from the jabs.
      • A June, 2021 American Medical Association survey (accessible here) showed over 96% of the 300 doctors surveyed were fully jabbed against COVID-19. [43]
      • The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) decided to check out the AMA's 96% claim. [44]
      • It turns out that the AMA's 300 survey respondents were not inclusive of all doctors. In the AAPS survey, nearly 60% of some 700 respondents said they were not "fully vaccinated." [45]
      • Of these, 80% said "I believe risk of shots outweighs risk of disease."
      • Both physicians and non-physicians were invited to submit comments about side effects in patients that they were aware of. More than 2,500 did so, and these are available just as entered - no screening, editing, or fact-checking.
      • One doctor wrote, "It would require a book to list all the adverse events occurring now and the deluge of others that will surface in time."
  • Other medical professionals
    • (9/10/21) Medical professionals are telling those adversely affected by the injections to stay silent/keep the media away about the cause if they want to receive treatment. [413]
  • Hospitals
    • Overflowing hospitals -- An exaggerated claim
      • (9/19/21) PROOF: Hospitals are lying about being overrun with Covid patients… many facilities are EMPTY
        • Josh Snider, who worked in facilities management at Missouri Baptist Medical Center (MBMC), personally confirmed that his hospital has been largely empty, despite claims by upper management that it is "overflowing with Covid patients." [506]
        • "I watched our hospital administrators say in the media that our intensive care units were overflowing with COVID patients, at 98% capacity, knowing that it was a complete and utter lie." [506]
        • Snider relates that the MBMC hospital actually shut down three out of four floors of intensive care during COVID because they were UNUSED. [506]
        • "And even after shutting down three-fourths of our ICU capacity, they were still never more than 50% full with that drastically reduced overall capacity. These medical systems that are saying they are overrun with COVID patients are likely lying to the public" [506]
        • MBMC has refused to comment for this story after repeated requests for comment. [506]
      • As for viral social media posts by doctors and nurses claiming hospitals are overflowing with unvaccinated COVID patients, don’t believe them. Most are bots. We’ve repeatedly seen evidence that fearmongering is being spread not by real people but by fake accounts run by artificial intelligence. This includes blue check accounts. Here’s a sampling of recent bot farm tweets trying to scare everyone. [266]
    • Some hospitals are struggling after requiring medical staff to get the jab. [281]
    • (9/2/21) Healthcare administrators are warning the New York State Department of Health that they'll lose significant percentages of their healthcare workers once jab mandates go into effect. Governing boards are standing firm on the mandates but are exploring exemptions in case the worker shortages get too severe. Administrators are countering, saying by then it'll be too late -- the workers would have already been long gone (video -- watch the last 7 minutes). [339]
    • How Medicare is paying hospitals more for COVID-19 patients
      • When patients are discharged, hospitals assign them a code on their diagnosis and treatment, and Medicare pays hospitals a set amount based on that code. [261]
      • When Congress drew up the CARES Act, it created a 20% “add on” for treatment of COVID-19 patients. [261]
      • “The key component of it was an additional reimbursement for patients who had COVID to offset the revenue they would’ve made for their typical procedures,” explained hospital billing expert Shawn Fry. “Depending on the severity of the patient, you could make double, or even four or five times as much on that COVID patient.” [261]
      • Kaiser Family Foundation: The average Medicare payment for a less severe COVID-19 hospitalization was $13,297. [261]
      • For a hospitalization requiring a ventilator it was $40,218. This includes the 20% “add on” (New COVID-19 Treatments Add-on Payment (NCTAP)) through the CARES Act. That increases the hospital’s standard payment for similar treatment of non-COVID patients. [261]

Hippocratic Oath

https://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/greek_oath.html

I swear by Apollo the physician, and Asclepius, and Hygieia and Panacea and all the gods and goddesses as my witnesses, that, according to my ability and judgement, I will keep this Oath and this contract:

To hold him who taught me this art equally dear to me as my parents, to be a partner in life with him, and to fulfill his needs when required; to look upon his offspring as equals to my own siblings, and to teach them this art, if they shall wish to learn it, without fee or contract; and that by the set rules, lectures, and every other mode of instruction, I will impart a knowledge of the art to my own sons, and those of my teachers, and to students bound by this contract and having sworn this Oath to the law of medicine, but to no others.

I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgement, and I will do no harm or injustice to them.

I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan; and similarly I will not give a woman a pessary to cause an abortion.

In purity and according to divine law will I carry out my life and my art.

I will not use the knife, even upon those suffering from stones, but I will leave this to those who are trained in this craft.

Into whatever homes I go, I will enter them for the benefit of the sick, avoiding any voluntary act of impropriety or corruption, including the seduction of women or men, whether they are free men or slaves.

Whatever I see or hear in the lives of my patients, whether in connection with my professional practice or not, which ought not to be spoken of outside, I will keep secret, as considering all such things to be private.

So long as I maintain this Oath faithfully and without corruption, may it be granted to me to partake of life fully and the practice of my art, gaining the respect of all men for all time. However, should I transgress this Oath and violate it, may the opposite be my fate.

Translated by Michael North, National Library of Medicine, 2002.

Summary: People are submitting exemptions to employer "vaccination" mandates. 

General Information

  • The private sector is embracing vaccine mandates for its employees [197]
  • Can employers require employee vaccination? In most states, employers can set the terms and conditions of employment at its workplace, including requiring that employees receive a COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of initial or continued employment. [198]
  • Generally, employers may collect information about whether employees have been vaccinated and, under federal law, may require employees to show proof of receipt of a COVID-19 vaccination [199]

Religious Exemptions [200]

  • (9/15/21) Conway Regional Health System in Arkansas is making it a bit more difficult for staff to receive a religious exemption. It is now requiring staff to also swear off a list of 30 commonly used medicines that "fall into the same category as the COVID-19 vaccine in their use of fetal cell lines." [435]
    • The list includes Tylenol, Pepto Bismol, aspirin, Tums, Lipitor, Senokot, Motrin, ibuprofen, Maalox, Ex-Lax, Benadryl, Sudafed, albuterol, Preparation H, MMR vaccine, Claritin, Zoloft, Prilosec OTC, and azithromycin. [435]
  • (9/5/21) Those claiming religious exemptions may have to take a "sincerity test" [389]
    • “In cases where you’ve got a lot of potential insincere claims — and I think there’s evidence that is what’s happening here in which people are raising religious objections when they’re motivated by fear of the vaccine or political opposition to it — testing sincerity makes sense.”
    • “We have to test sincerity or else we have to accept them all or deny them all, so I think the courts will provide room for testing that.”
    • Liberty Counsel — an evangelical ministry that provides legal assistance in religious liberty cases — provides a 23-minute video guide that has been viewed more than 150,000 times on how to file a religious exemption. It, like other groups, also provides a handful of sample documents to file for an exemption.
  • Rutherford Institute issues guidance on how to request a religious exemption for COVID-19 vaccine mandates in the workplace. [279]
  • The majority opinion in Prince v. Massachusetts (1944) stated, “the right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or death.” (Religious exemptions to vaccination have become common more recently). [414]
  • How employers should handle an employee's vaccination exemption request [202]
  • Employers may need to make exceptions to mandatory vaccination policies for employees with sincerely held religious beliefs that prevent them from being vaccinated. [201]
  • The EEOC recommends that employers assume a request for religious accommodation is legitimate unless there is an objective basis for questioning either the religious nature or sincerity of a particular belief, practice or observance. [203]
  • (8/26/21) New York state is ending its acceptance of religious exemptions for COVID vaccine by health care workers. [332]
  • States cannot refuse an exemption to those whose interpretation differs from their religion’s doctrine regarding vaccination. It’s not the state's job to enforce a religion’s rules on its believers, the state is tasked simply with assessing whether the religious objection is sincere. [204]
  • How to write a religious exemption letter [205]

Medical Exemptions (PEG / Polysorbate) [200]

  • General Information
    • If an individual claims a vaccination medical exemption, an employer (1) may request that the employee provide a physician’s note and (2) must determine if the employee has a qualifying disability under the ADA and if an alternative accommodation can be offered. [206]
    • Employees may likewise be protected from retaliation under discrimination laws for raising concerns about a vaccination program because of medical conditions, religion, or other protected status. [207]

[176]

  • PEG
    • "The two vaccines [Pfizer's and Moderna's] both contain mRNA wrapped in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that help carry it to human cells." [301]
    • "The LNPs are “PEGylated”—chemically attached to PEG molecules that cover the outside of the particles and increase their stability and life span." [301]
    • "All mRNA vaccines are likely to contain PEG, which is used to stabilize the lipid nanoparticles, and the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine also contains PEG 2000." [304]
    • "PEGs are also used in everyday products such as toothpaste and shampoo as thickeners, solvents, softeners, and moisture carriers, and they’ve been used as a laxative for decades. An increasing number of biopharmaceuticals include PEGylated compounds as well." [301]
    • "PEG has never been used before in an approved vaccine, but it is found in many drugs that have occasionally triggered anaphylaxis." [301]
    • "Anaphylaxis is a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat." [301]
    • "She [a woman who had an allergic reaction to an injection-containing PEG] described urticaria [red, itchy welts that result from a skin reaction] with shampoos, conditioners, shower gels containing PEG and immediate burning of the mouth with toothpastes and mouthwash containing PEG. She had never received products such as laxatives, depo-progesterone or depo-methylprednisolone containing PEG 3500." [302]
    • "Allergic reactions can be severe or even fatal." [302]
    • "As far as we can determine, PEG has not been used as an excipient in vaccines until now." [303]
    • "In a patient with suspected or proven PEG allergy, mRNA vaccines containing PEG should be avoided." [303]
    • "Investigation of PEG allergy carries a risk of anaphylaxis and should only be undertaken in specialist drug allergy centres with full resuscitation capabilities." [303]

  • Polysorbate
    • "Polysorbate 80 is an excipient in the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine." [303]
    • "If the patient has tolerated an influenza vaccine or other injected preparation containing polysorbate 80, they can receive the AstraZeneca vaccine available in the UK, and the Janssen/Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine in the United States and EU." [303]

Letters / Memos to Employers (here)

  • Sample religious exemption letters (here and here)
  • For Employer to Sign to Acknowledge Laws and Risks (Word Doc) [208]
  • Decline Vaccine Form Adult or Child (PDF) [208]
  • School – Decline Injection Card [208]
  • PCR Test Before Surgery or Treatment (Word Doc) [208]
  • Notice of Acceptance of Liability (Word Doc) [208]

Adverse Reactions

  • A mandated workplace shot carries with it the possibility of liability if employees have adverse reactions. [209]
  • There are no state laws that expressly provide immunity to employers who mandate the vaccine. [210]
  • If an employee has an adverse reaction to a vaccination which an employer has required, employers are unlikely to face civil liability in this situation. Although the law differs by state, in most states, this type of injury will be deemed to fall under workers’ compensation laws, which typically supply an employee’s exclusive remedy. [211]
  • OSHA’s ETS requires covered employers to provide paid leave for recovery from vaccination side effects. California’s COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave law now includes time spent recovering from vaccine side effects that prevent the employee from working. [212]
    •  

Summary: Below, we report what others have been using/experimenting with to minimize or prevent Covid-related adverse reactions and death. 

.

FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)

  • If alternative treatments (like Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine) were considered effective, the vaccines never would have gotten Emergency Use Authorization in the U.S.
  • FDA Criteria for issuance under Emergency Use Authorization [333]
    • There must be a serious or life-threatening disease or condition.
    • There must be evidence of effectiveness
    • The known and potential benefits of the product, when used to diagnose, prevent, or treat the identified disease or condition, must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product
    • "For FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition."
  • Because alternatives have not been approved by the FDA for use against Covid, the usage of an injection-based therapy was enabled. [338]

Alternative Treatment Options

  • My Free Doctor
    • People are sending their loved ones here for information on how to get early treatment.
    • These doctors will get them the prescriptions they need for free.
    • They have lawyers standing by to get loved ones out of the hospital and into real treatment.

General Protocols

  • Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance Prevention & Treatment Protocols for COVID-19
  • Study: 29 of 33 COVID-19 patients were completely without any symptoms after only 2 days of treatment. Then two more patients, for a total of 31 out of 33 patients, reached total resolution of all symptoms with just two more days of treatment. That is a 94% success rate in treating COVID-19 in only 4 days or less. Click here for the protocol. [80]
  • Dr. Gustavo Aguirre-Chang then developed and used a treatment protocol for persons with COVID-19. He used this protocol to treat over 300 patients. Here is the protocol: Aguirre-Chang Treatment Protocol for COVID-19. [81]
  • Dr. Chang stated to Dr. Pierre Kory in an interview of Kory by Dr. Mobeen Syed that Chang has treated about 300 COVID-19 patients with this protocol, with 75 to 85% success rate. [82]
  • Dr. Sherry Tenpenny elaborates on these protocols and includes recommended supplement dosage amounts. [83]
  • 30 studies show evidence that optimum levels of vitamin D in the blood may reduce your risk from Covid-19. It includes an Open Letter on Vitamin D and Covid-19, signed by over 200 physicians, researchers, and other experts on vitamin D and Covid-19. They recommend 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily for 2 to 3 weeks, followed by 4,000 IU daily continuously (at least as long as the pandemic continues). [84]
  • Watch this video of a FNP-C in Birmingham, AL discussing ways to treat Covid before and after you've caught it. Quote: "There is no reason for people to be sick and dying of Covid."

.

Ivermectin

  • Merck's double-sided position on Ivermectin
    • Ivermectin is good for billions worldwide
      • (1975): Dr. William Campbell of Merck Research Laboratories suggests the use of Mectizan® (ivermectin) against river blindness in humans and the drug is reformulated and tested in clinical trials. [356]
      • (1987): After testing proves safety and efficacy, Merck & Co., Inc. CEO Roy Vagelos announces the company’s commitment to donate Mectizan to treat river blindness for as long as needed. [356]
      • (1996): Merck’s patent on Ivermectin expired. [357]
      • (1998): "Merck expanded its commitment to include donating Mectizan for another disease, lymphatic filariasis (LF), also known as elephantiasis, in African countries and Yemen where it co-exists with river blindness." [356]
      • (2002): Merck and MDP celebrate the 250 millionth treatment of Mectizan in Bombani, Tanzania. [356]
      • (2011): Merck touts its more than 1 billion treatments have been approved cumulatively by MDP for the treatment of onchocerciasis. [356]
      • (2015): Merck's Dr. William C. Campbell, Ph.D., is jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of Ivermectin, which led to the development of Mectizan. [356]
      • (2017): Merck expands the mandate of MDP to reach up to an additional 100 million people annually to accelerate LF elimination in countries eligible for “triple therapy” or “IDA” with ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole. [356]
      • (Today): Merck's own websites brag about how over 34 years, it has distributed a safe Ivermectin to over 100 million people per year and (over time) 4 billion worldwide: [358]
        • "Today, the MDP is the longest-running, disease-specific drug donation program of its kind and has been influential in the development of a number of other drug donation programs." [358]
        • "The program reaches more than 300 million people in the affected areas annually, with more than 4 billion treatments donated since 1987." [358]
        • Kitasato University professor Hideaki Hanaki: "Hundreds of millions of people take ivermectin every year, so it is unlikely to cause frequent, heavy side effects." [359]
    • (12/23/20): Merck received $356 million from the US government to develop an investigational therapeutic. [360]
    • (2/4/21) Mysteriously (after administering 4 billion doses), Merck says Ivermectin is unsafe and has "A concerning lack of safety data" [361]
      • (2/4/21): Merck releases a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against Covid-19 and bizarrely claimed, "A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies" of the drug they donated to be distributed in mass rollouts, by primary care workers, in mass campaigns, to millions in developing countries. [63]
  • The powers that be wage a propaganda war against Ivermectin
    • (2/4/21): The media reports the anti-Ivermectin Merck statement as a blinding truth. [362] [260]
    • (3/9/21) The FDA issues an urgent warning letter stating that "Never use medications [namely Ivermectin] intended for animals on yourself." [364]
    • (3/31/21) The WHO quotes Merck, as evidence that it didn't work, in their recommendation against the use of Ivermectin. [365]
    • (8/21/21) FDA posts a warning ("You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.") showing its ignorance about Merck's MDP. [338] [367]
    • (9/1/21) The American Medical Association, the American Pharmacists Association and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists called for “an immediate end to the prescribing, dispensing and use of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 outside of a clinical trial.” [385]
    • (9/6/21) The mass media and its cadre of expert, top-of-the-profession journalists perpetuated a hoax that an Oklahoma hospital was overrun with Ivermectin overdosers. [391]
      • Here are screenshots of the "journalists" who didn't do their basic jobs (verifying the information they're given) and were duped. [392]
      • And the question: "Whatever Happened to the Journalistic B.S. Detector?" [393]
  • Merck could have tested Ivermectin vs SARS-CoV-2, but declined. [366]
    • Ivermectin use early in the pandemic was proposed by Kitasato University including the co-discoverer of Ivermectin, Nobel Prize winner Dr. Satoshi Omura. [366]
    • They requested Merck conduct clinical trials of Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Japan, because Merck has priority to submit an application for an expansion of ivermectin's indications. Merck declined. [366]
  • Yet Merck's own documents continue to tout Ivermectin's safety
    • "Ivermectin had no adverse effects on the fertility in rats in studies at repeated doses of up to 3 times the maximum recommended human dose of 200 mcg/kg (on a mg/m2/day basis)." [368]
    • "Ivermectin does not appear to be selectively fetotoxic to the developing fetus."

    • The words of the son of Merck's founder, George W. Merck, in 1950: “Medicine is for the people. It is not for profits”. [366]
  • Ivermectin has an established safety profile for human use
    • Ivermectin is listed in the World Health Organization’s Model List of Essential Medicines. [369]
      • (2/12/96) The FDA approved ivermectin for non-veterinary use, the chemotherapy of two parasitic infections, strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis, in humans. [333]
      • Ivermectin has been used in humans in other countries since 1987, and had been used to treat more than 5.2 million people worldwide by Feb, 1996. [333]
      • Studies substantiate use in humans
        • Gonzalez Canga et al., 2008 [370]
        • Jans et al., 2019 [371]
        • Buonfrate et al., 2019 [372]
        • Caly et al, 2020 [373]
  • Studies supposedly proving Ivermectin is NOT safe and effective against Covid-19
    • (2011) Nigerian study supposedly shows decreased sperm counts, increased sperm deformities among men taking Ivermectin. [405]
      • The sample size was 37 men (a tiny fraction of the sample sizes showing Ivermectin is safe to use).
      • The study was not published in a credible journal, nor was it hosted by an accredited, reputable institution to oversee study parameters.
      • No mention of financial ties.
      • "The patients were treated with 150µg/kg body wt of ivermectin for eleven months." The study report doesn't say how often the dosage was administered.
      • There are no known protocols which call for Ivermectin to be given for 11 months.
      • The report never considers the possibility of alternate causalities (i.e., something else caused the sperm abnormalities).
      • In the decade since the study’s supposed 2011 publication, there has been little — if any — related research to confirm its findings.
      • A spokesperson for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration told Snopes that infertility in men is not a known side effect of ivermectin and, as such, is not included in U.S. labeling requirements. [406]
      • FDA: Ivermectin was also shown to have no adverse effects on the fertility in rats in studies at repeated doses of up to three times the maximum recommended human dose. [406]
      • There were also typos present in the study that should have been caught by scientific editors publishing in a credible journal. [406]
      • With all these glaring deficiencies in the study, the media still reports the study as fact. [407]
    • August 2021 study: Ivermectin had “no effect whatsoever” on the disease, according to a large patient study. [262]
      • The study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. [259]
    • WHO updated their treatment recommendations on 3/30/2021. [124]
      • For ivermectin, they reported a mortality odds ratio of 0.19 [0.09-0.36] based on 7 studies with 1,419 patients.
      • They do not specify which trials they included. The report is inconsistent, with a forest plot that only shows 4 studies with mortality results.
    • Argentina study of 501 people [375]
      • Randomized, quadruple-controlled.
      • Concluded that the drug had no significant effect on preventing the hospitalization of patients with COVID-19. [376]
      • Of course! Even the study team acknowledged material limitations, including first that the study was underpowered; the dosage was “below the doses proposed as probably effective.” [376]
  • Meta analysis proving Ivermectin is safe and effective against Covid-19
    • Zaidi et al, 2021 [377]
      • Real-time data is also available with a meta-analysis of 55 studies to date.
      • As per data available on 16 May 2021, 100% of 36 early treatment and prophylaxis studies report positive effects (96% of all 55 studies).
        • Of these, 26 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation.
      • Random effects meta-analysis with pooled effects using the most serious outcome reported 79% and 85% improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis respectively.
      • The results were similar after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and after restriction to 29 peer-reviewed studies.
      • Statistically significant improvements were seen for mortality, ventilation, hospitalization, cases, and viral clearance.
      • 100% of the 17 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early treatment and prophylaxis report positive effects, with an estimated improvement of 73% and 83% respectively, and 93% of all 28 RCTs.
      • The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive for the 55 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 23 trillion.
      • The consistency of positive results across a wide variety of cases has been remarkable. It is extremely unlikely that the observed results could have occurred by chance.
    • Yagisawa et al [366]
      • "Of the 18 studies in the table, 13 showed that the ivermectin test group was significantly superior to the control group in terms of judgment categories."
      • "Regulators argue that existing data on the efficacy of ivermectin for COVID-19 are biased in its study plans and methods, and are insufficient to determine validity. A meta-analysis of 14,906 patients in the 42 clinical trials described above has shown sufficient efficacy of ivermectin, with a 1 in 4 trillion chance of the conclusion being a mistake. Yet, it is still considered insufficient evidence."
      • "Randomized controlled trials are regarded important by regulators. There are 21 trials employing 2,869 patients out of 42 studies. If regulators argue that studies of this magnitude are inadequate to allow the clinical use of ivermectin in COVID-19, then legitimate and compelling explanations for such judgements should be required."
      • "Both the meta-analysis of 15 clinical studies by Lawrie103) of the United Kingdom (who is a consultant for WHO clinical trials) and that of 18 clinical studies102) conducted by Hill (who is also a consultant of the WHO) in collaboration with 40 researchers from 13 countries have been carried out. Such analyses have affirmed the effectiveness of ivermectin for COVID-19, after fully analyzing for the bias of beliefs (that ivermectin was effective or that the placebo was ineffective). However, the results of such a meta-analysis are rated as “insufficient data” and “very low certainty” by the panels of the NIH and the IDSA Clinical Evaluation Guidelines Committee."
      • "As of the 27th of February 2021, the results of 42 clinical studies worldwide have undergone meta-analysis and concluded that ivermectin is effective in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19."
    • Hill et al, 2021 [378]
      • A review of 24 clinical single or double-blinded trials involving 2,282 patients.
        • 9 trials involved a single dose of Ivermectin; 15 trials involved multiple doses up to 7 days.
        • 18 trials were either single or double-blinded and 6 were open-label.
      • Results
        • Four out of 5 trials measuring CRP demonstrated significant reductions in CRP compared to controls.
        • "In 11 randomized trials of moderate/severe infection, there was a 56% reduction in mortality among those who used Ivermectin."
        • "In a meta-analysis of viral clearance with subgroups of dose duration, there were significant differences in time to viral clearance in favour of ivermectin (Mean Difference: -3.00 days]."
        • "In a meta-analysis of clinical recovery with subgroups of dose duration, there were significant differences in time to clinical recovery in favour of ivermectin (Mean Difference -1.58 days]."
        • "Ivermectin demonstrated a shorter duration of hospitalization compared to control (Mean Difference -4.27 days]."
        • "Across these 11 trials in 2127 patients, there were 35/1064 (3%) deaths in the ivermectin arms, versus 93/1063 (9%) deaths in the control arms. In a combined analysis using inverse variance weighting, ivermectin showed a 56% reduction in mortality."
      • "Ivermectin may also have a role in short-term prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggested by pilot studies [53, 54]. This potential benefit also needs to be validated in larger randomized trials."
      • "At standard doses of 0.2-0.4mg/kg for 1-2 days, ivermectin has a good safety profile and has been distributed to billions of patients worldwide in mass drug administration programs. A recent meta-analysis found no significant difference in adverse events in those given higher doses of ivermectin, of up to 2mg/kg, and those receiving longer courses, of up to 4 days, compared to those receiving standard doses."
  • Studies proving Ivermectin is safe and effective against Covid-19

    • (4/3/20) Royal Melbourne Hospital (Australia) study [373]
      • "Ivermectin is a potent inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 clinical isolate Australia/VIC01/2020."
      • "At 24 h, there was a 93% reduction in viral RNA present in the supernatant (indicative of released virions) of samples treated with ivermectin."
      • "Similarly a 99.8% reduction in cell-associated viral RNA (indicative of unreleased and unpackaged virions) was observed with ivermectin treatment."
      • "By 48 h this effect increased to an ~5000-fold reduction of viral RNA in ivermectin-treated compared to control samples, indicating that ivermectin treatment resulted in the effective loss of essentially all viral material by 48 h."
      • "Consistent with this idea, no further reduction in viral RNA was observed at 72 h. As we have observed previously (Lundberg et al.,2013; Tay et al., 2013; Wagstaffet al., 2012), no toxicity of ivermectin was observed at any of the timepoints tested, in either the sample wells or in parallel tested drug alone samples."
      • "A single dose [is] able to control viral replication within 24–48 h in our system."
      • "This Brief Report raises the possibility that ivermectin could be a useful antiviral to limit SARS-CoV-2, in similar fashion to those already reported."
      • "Altogether the current report, combined with a known-safety profile, demonstrates that ivermectin is worthy of further consideration as a possible SARS-CoV-2 antiviral."
    • (5/3/21) Mexico City study [379]
      • Study population
        • 156,468 Covid positive cases were not treated with Ivermectin
        • 77,381 Covid positive cases were treated with Ivermectin (low dose 12 mg a day for 2 days).
        • Via telephone, 57,598 were the controls and 18,074 were treated.
      • Results
        • A 68.6% lower probability of being hospitalized.
        • Treated patients who required hospitalization had 68.4% less hospitalization time.
        • The results would have had more success if the Ivermectin dose was closer to the USA standard of 80 mg per day over 7 days.
    • Bangladesh study [380]
      • Among those patients who received Ivermectin:
        • Lower rates of supplemental oxygen were reported (9.6% vs 45.9%)
        • Respiratory difficulties were reduced (2.6% vs 15.8%)
        • As was the need for antibiotics (15.7% vs 60.2%)
        • And the need for intensive care (0.09% vs 8.3%).
        • The length of stay in hospital was nine days for the Ivermectin patients vs 15 days for the control patients.
    • Gorial (Iraq) -- Decreased hospital stay [381]
    • Babaloa (Nigeria), Bukhari (Pakistan) and Krolewiecki (Argentina) -- Quicker elimination of viral components [366]
    • Chaccour (Spain) -- Fewer Covid symptoms [382]
    • Shaouman (Egypt) and Carvallo (Argentina) -- Improved prophylaxis [366]
    • Cadegiani (Brazil) -- Less hospitalization [383]
    • Naiee (Iran) -- Decreased mortality [366]
  • Countries demonstrating positive results from using Ivermectin on Covid patients
    • Multiple countries and regions have formally adopted Ivermectin into their treatment guidelines, with several having done so only recently, based on the emerging data compiled by the FLCCC Alliance. Examples include; Macedonia, Belize, Uttar Pradesh in India, Alto Paran in Paraguay, Chiapas in Mexico, Lima in Peru, etc.” [117]
    • India [384]
      • "The Uttar Pradesh government has claimed that it was the first state to have introduced a large-scale “prophylactic and therapeutic” use of Ivermectin"
      • "The drug helped the state to maintain a lower fatality and positivity rate as compared to other states."
      • “Despite being the state with the largest population base and a high population density, we have maintained a relatively low positivity rate and cases per million of population”
      • "Agra District Magistrate Prabhu N Singh also attributed the state’s relative success in keeping the Covid numbers down to the timely nod to the use of Ivermectin as a prophylactic."
      • “We introduced it (Ivermectin) for three days, 12 mg as advised in the national guidelines at the time, followed by tests on the fourth or fifth day. We introduced it in the jail as well and the results helped us reduce positivity to a great extent."
    • Peru [374]
      • "Peru distributed packs containing ivermectin and other medicines to the public. In the Lima region, where distribution of the packs was delayed, it was confirmed that the infection rate of COVID-19 and mortality rate were significantly higher compared to the other eight regions where packs had been distributed earlier. In Peru, the Ministry of Defense, the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Police have mass-distributed ivermectin through an operation against COVID-19 named “Mega-Operation Tayta (MOT)”. These efforts resulted in a decrease in nationwide deaths by one fourteenth (1/14). However, that number started to increase after the distribution was stopped due to a change of government in November."
    • Slovakia became the first EU nation to formally approve Ivermectin for both prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19 patients. [119]
  • Other complimentary facts
    • (9/14/21) Australian government bans ivermectin prescriptions for Covid (so it can maximize Covid casualties?) [450]
    • (9/4/21) World’s highest-paid podcaster, Joe Rogan, catches Covid and beats it in 3 days [390]
      • He used Ivermectin and vitamin drip
      • No mention of vaccines
      • MSM and vaccine industrial complex are FURIOUS
    • (12/8/21) Dr. Pierre Kory: "Ivermectin is highly safe, widely available, and low cost." [394]
      • "We now have data from over 20 well-designed clinical studies, 10 of them randomized, controlled trials, with every study consistently reporting large magnitude and statistically significant benefits in decreasing transmission rates, shortening recovery times, decreasing hospitalizations, or large reductions in deaths. These data show that ivermectin is effectively a 'miracle drug' against COVID-19."
    • Dr. Mark Trozzi: Ivermectin Works [220]
    • Ivermectin reportedly helps with those who have received jab and have been experiencing convulsions [190]
    • 17 randomized controlled trials used Ivermectin for early treatment and prophylaxis reported positive effects, with an estimated improvement of 73% and 83%, respectively. Out of 37 early treatment and prophylaxis studies for ivermectin, 97% report positive effects. One of the studies documents how ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and displays broad-spectrum anti-viral activity against the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2). This study showed a 5,000-fold reduction in viral RNA after just 48 hours. [11]
    • “Research has demonstrated that using this medicine (Ivermectin) for prophylaxis (preventative) can reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection by 92.5%.” [118]
    • "WHO's analysis predicts that over 2 million fewer people would be dead if ivermectin was used from early in the pandemic" [124]
    • Chairman, Tokyo Medical Association: "We cannot say that Ivermectin is absolutely not effective" [298]
      • Lower Covid case rate
      • Lower Covid death rate
      • "We can afford to give them [patients] this treatment."
      • Why is the Tokyo Medical Association announcing publicly that it is recommending that all doctors in Japan begin treating Covid patients with Ivermectin? This happened after they witnessed the amazing effect that Ivermectin has had on Covid patients in Africa and India.
  • The Big Picture
    • While governments say Ivermectin lacks efficacy, its experimental, synthetic "vaccines" (with no history and skipped past many studies and trials) are declared safe and effective. [9], [10]
      • There are no long-term safety studies
      • There are no studies showing it's safe for fertility in rats
      • There are no studies showing lack of toxicity in developing fetuses
    • None of the regulators' disparaging statements about Ivermectin included detailed background information surrounding their warnings. [366]
    • The preponderance of the evidence shows Ivermectin is effective against Covid-19
      • "Much evidence is shown in the six papers (144~150) of fundamental research presented by the FLCCC Alliance." [366]
      • "Furthermore, 13 papers on clinical efficacy and safety also discuss the mechanism of action of ivermectin, which is the basis of clinical efficacy." [366]
      • "Therefore, it is natural that there are criticisms that Merck's claim is misunderstood; it is due to a lack of a sufficient search of existing documents on the topic." [366]
      • "Regulators claim that “there is not enough evidence to accept it,” but the safety level of ivermectin has already been achieved by means of the MDP granting more than 3 billion doses to individuals over 30 years." [366]
    • What could be the reason for those regulators' decisions against the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 cases?
      • Yagisawa: "Frankly speaking, WHO, FDA, EMA (European Medicines Agency), and also Japanese MHW (Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare) are very much wishing to develop vaccine to prevent COVID… But if you use, if we use ivermectin for prophylaxis, pharmaceutical companies will lose the market of vaccine throughout the world.” [373]

Hydroxychloroquine

  • Government claim
    • Hydroxychloroquine lacks efficacy, but experimental, synthetic "vaccines" (with no history and skipped past many studies and trials) are safe and effective. [9], [10]
  • Reality: People are seeing good results with Hydroxychloroquine.
    • “The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the outpatient setting after early treatment with zinc, low-dose hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.” …“Therefore, the odds of hospitalisation of treated patients was 84% less than in the untreated patients.” [121]

Remdesivir

We have compiled our first downloadable / shareable fact sheet. Our first fact sheet (accessible here) is on Remdesivir. Here is the executive summary of our research:

  • After 6 months of a one-year study of meds being used to combat Ebola, the study was discontinued because Remdesivir because it killed 53% of the people in the study. [463]
  • In April 2020, Fauci (in White House news conference) said, "The data shows that Remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery. What it has proven is that a drug can block this virus." [497]
  • However, within months, numerous studies showed Remdesivir wasn't a home run. It wasn't a remarkable improvement in terms of mortality, or even the lengthening or shortening of the length of hospital stay. [474]
  • Almost one-fifth of those on the National Institutes of Health panel charged with overseeing treatment recommendations for Covid worked or had significant ties with Gilead Sciences (Remdesivir’s maker).The panel also discouraged doctors from using hydroxychloroquine, without any supporting documentation. [499]
  • Evidence suggests that those using Remdesivir to treat Covid require invasive mechanical ventilation and has a high potential for inflicting significant (even life-threatening) adverse events. [476]
  • Patients with advanced kidney disease were not included in Remdesivir trials due to concerns about the drug’s potential toxicity. And sure enough, there is some data indicating Remdesivir has an adverse effect on human kidneys. [467], [468], [469]

Over-The-Counter (OTC) drugs

  • (7/6/21) Comprehensive Pain Management Institute Study: Early treatment with proven natural remedies defeats Covid
    • Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine: Early intervention against Covid-19 using natural, over-the-counter remedies is a safe, effective way to avoid complications. [446]
    • Just under 4% of the compliant test group presented flu-like symptoms, but none of the test group was COVID-positive [446]
    • 20% of the non-compliant control group presented flu-like symptoms, three-quarters of whom (15% overall of the control group) were COVID-positive. [446]

Fenofibrate

  • (8/6/21) British researchers have just published a peer-reviewed paper touting the effectiveness of fenofibrate [217]
  • "A licensed drug normally used to treat abnormal levels of fatty substances in the blood could reduce infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus by up to 70 percent, reveals a study in the laboratory by an international collaboration of researchers." [218]
  • "The research team, led by the University of Birmingham and Keele University in the UK and the San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Italy, has demonstrated that fenofibrate and its active form (fenofibric acid) can significantly reduce SARS-COV-2 infection in human cells in the laboratory," [218]
  • "Importantly, reduction of infection was obtained using concentrations of the drug which are safe and achievable using the standard clinical dose of fenofibrate." [218]

Natto

  • Researchers: Fermented Japanese superfood “Natto” can inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infections [3]

Black Seed

  • NIH published paper: Nigella sativa (black seed) prevents covid-induced vascular damage. [4]

Chlorine Dioxide

  • (9/14/21) Chlorine dioxide approved as COVID-19 treatment in Bolivia [448]
  • “In conclusion, we can affirm without a doubt, based on test of comparison of proportions and its confidence interval, as well as the paired tests where we used the Wilcoxon – Mann – Whitney test (a: 95%), that the data in most of the variables (P < 0.05) obtained indicate that chlorine dioxide is effective in the treatment of COVID19, making RT-PCR negative in one hundred percent of cases at 7 days, significantly and rapidly modifying the symptoms of the disease, significantly reducing laboratory parameters to normality within 14 to 21 days.” [120]

Oh goodie! New types of pharmaceuticals!

  • (8/31/21) Antibody Cocktail
    • AstraZeneca-supported formulation neutralizes SARS-CoV-2, has prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy in NHPs, with projected human protection up to 12 months [395]
    • Monoclonal antibodies show promise in decreasing the negative effects of Covid-19 [396]
      • They are laboratory-made proteins that mimic the body's immune system
      • They are typically given intravenously over 20 minutes in an outpatient setting, followed by an hour of monitoring for adverse side effects.
      • If taken within 10 days after symptoms appear, they stop the virus, keeping people with COVID from getting seriously ill.
      • The treatments can reduce the risk for hospitalization and death by about 70 percent, and can shorten the average duration of symptoms by four days (down from 14 to 10 days), compared to patients who did not receive the treatment.
  • The Israeli molecular "super cork"
    • The new drug blocks the coronavirus's entry point to the cell without damaging the entry point's enzymatic function. [269]
    • This approach is not susceptible to new variants. [269]
    • Could be administered via an aerosol-based spray that would allow the molecule to be administered by inhalation to patients. [269]
    • The treatment has so far been tested on hamsters infected with the coronavirus at the NIH. Preliminary results show that the treatment significantly reduces disease symptoms. [269]
    • More preclinical studies are planned to take place at the NIH in the near future. [269]

  • Watch this video of a FNP-C in Birmingham, AL discussing ways to treat Covid before and after you've caught it. Quote: "There is no reason for people to be sick and dying of Covid."

  • Repent, pray and ask God that you'll be forgiven for your idolatry (trusting in the arm of flesh, not God).

MITIGATION EFFORTS

“First they ask.
Then they push.
Then they shove.
Then they make it law.
Then they come by force”

Summary: (1) If the injections work, then why do we need to keep wearing masks? (2) Americans -- and, surprisingly, the media -- have lost track of what the CDC's guidelines are. (3) Numerous studies prove that wearing masks is unnecessary and even dangerous.

Masks aren’t justified and/or are harmful to the general population

  • Studies
    • (9/8/21) NEW STUDY: Government's own scientists say mask mandates have no impact. [404]
      • "Conclusions: There was no reduction in per-population daily mortality, hospital bed, ICU bed, or ventilator occupancy of COVID-19-positive patients attributable to the implementation of a mask-wearing mandate." [404]
      • (We have no idea how many studies people need to believe that masks do not work with this virus).
    • (8/21/21) Study: Most cloth masks just don’t do the job when it comes to stopping the spread of coronavirus within enclosed spaces [278]
      • Studies continue to show that aerosols exhaled by infected individuals can indeed infect others with COVID-19, even if someone is standing more than six feet away. [278]
      • Many people wear masks that don’t fit their face properly. As a result, many cloth and surgical masks only filter about 10 percent of exhaled aerosols. The rest make their way past the mask, most through the top, and spread into the surrounding environment. [278]
      • In light of these findings study authors recommend that everyone wear a N95 or KN95 mask if possible whenever indoors in the company of others. [278]
    • A meta-analysis among health care workers found that compared to no masks, surgical mask and N95 respirators were not effective against transmission of viral infections or influenza-like illness based on six RCTs. [142]
    • "Another study among 158 health-care workers using protective personal equipment primarily N95 facemasks reported that 81% (128 workers) developed new headaches during their work shifts as these become mandatory due to COVID-19 outbreak. For those who used the N95 facemask greater than 4 h per day, the likelihood for developing a headache during the work shift was approximately four times higher [Odds ratio = 3.91, 95% CI (1.35–11.31) p = 0.012], while 82.2% of the N95 wearers developed the headache already within =10 to 50 min." [132], [150]
    • Study: "The Physiological Burden of Prolonged PPE Use on Healthcare Workers during Long Shifts" [133]
    • Meta-Analysis of 65 Studies Reveals Face Masks Induce Mask-Induced Exhaustion Syndrome (MIES) [135]
  • General Statements
    • "It is not clear however, what the scientific and clinical basis for wearing facemasks as protective strategy, given the fact that facemasks restrict breathing, causing hypoxemia and hypercapnia and increase the risk for respiratory complications, self-contamination and exacerbation of existing chronic conditions" [132], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140]
    • "Although several countries mandated wearing facemask in health care settings and public areas, scientific evidences are lacking supporting their efficacy for reducing morbidity or mortality associated with infectious or viral diseases." [132], [136], [140], [141]
    • "among symptomatic individuals (those with fever, cough, sore throat, runny nose ect…) there was no difference between wearing and not wearing facemask for coronavirus droplets transmission of particles of >5 µm." [132]
    • An early publication the WHO stated that “facemasks are not required, as no evidence is available on its usefulness to protect non-sick persons.” [140]
    • Clinical scientists from Departments of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology in Australia counsel against facemasks usage for health-care workers, arguing that there is no justification for such practice. [145]
    • "Wearing facemask mechanically restricts breathing by increasing the resistance of air movement during both inhalation and exhalation process." [132], [138], [139]
    • “Trapped air remaining between the mouth, nose and the facemask is rebreathed repeatedly in and out of the body, containing low O2 and high CO2 concentrations, causing hypoxemia and hypercapnia.” [132], [146], [147], [137], [138], [139]
    • "cloth masks have significant health and safety issues including moisture retention, reuse, poor filtration and increased risk for infection, providing recommendation against the use of cloth masks." [132], [141]
    • "Long-term practice of wearing facemasks has strong potential for devastating health consequences. Prolonged hypoxic-hypercapnic state compromises normal physiological and psychological balance, deteriorating health and promotes the developing and progression of existing chronic diseases." [132], [143], [144], [148], [149], [151], [152], [153], [137], [138], [139]
    • “The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19.” [132]
    • Masks which cover the mouth and nose induce undesirable side effects in everyday use and potential hazards [134]

What various countries are doing

  • United States
    • Now they’re needed again.
      • (7/28/21): Fauci: "The recommendations and the guidelines have been changed to say that if you are vaccinated, even though you are vaccinated, and are in an indoor, public setting in an area of the country with a high degree of viral dynamics (namely the red NRM sections on the CDC chart), then you need to wear a mask even though you are vaccinated." [157]
      • (7/27/21)"CDC says vaccinated people may transmit virus, recommends masks indoors." [185]
      • Yet the CDC chart (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#county-view) lists several counties (for example, Union County, OR) as "red" or "orange" despite having no COVID-related deaths over the last few weeks and months.
    • They're not needed anymore
      • (5/14/21): Biden says "If you've been fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask. Let me repeat: If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask." [156]
      • (3/30/21): “CDC data suggests vaccinated don’t carry, can’t spread virus.” [183]
  • Ireland
    • The Irish commissioned their own research on masks.
    • The Irish Department of Health found that masking children in the classroom is not a legitimate medical precaution. It's child abuse.
    • Masks can "exacerbate anxiety and breathing difficulties."
    • They impair "the development of human communication and language skills, particularly for very young children." [246]
    • (3/21) Ireland’s Department of Health announced that it won’t require masks in schools because they “may exacerbate anxiety or breathing difficulties for some students.”
    • Some children compensate for such difficulties by breathing through their mouths. Chronic and prolonged mouth breathing can alter facial development. It is well-documented that children who mouth-breathe because adenoids block their nasal airways can develop a mouth deformity and elongated face. [247]
  • England
    • Public Health England's medical adviser Dr Susan Hopkins:
      • "The consensus view is to not advise schoolchildren at primary school age (12 and under) to wear face coverings."
      • 'This is for two reasons: firstly they can have difficulty wearing them and keeping them on all day, and the second part of that is that it's really important that they can see facial expressions in order to develop their communications and language skills.'" [248]
  • Denmark
    • (8/9/21) Denmark abolishes all Corona measures [314]
    • Danish parliament recently decided in Copenhagen that all Corona measures should be ended from October 1. There will therefore no longer be a mask requirement and the test regime will be abolished. The Danes will then no longer have to provide evidence of whether they are vaccinated or unvaccinated, or whether they have tested positive or negative.

Aren’t justified and are harmful to Students

  • Epidemiology and biostatistics professor: The potential educational harms of mandatory-masking policies are much more firmly established, at least at this point, than their possible benefits in stopping the spread of COVID-19 in schools. [323]
  • (7/27/21): Walensky : "CDC recommends that everyone in the K-12 schools wear a mask indoors, including teachers, staff, students and visitors, regardless of vaccination status." [158]
  • (7/26/21): Psaki: "He (Biden) believes that we should be guided by the science and by the data, and so he will look to his health and medical team to advise on what steps we should take." [159]

There are no studies which justify student-wearing masks

  • (9/2/21) UC-San Fran public health expert: There is no evidence supporting school mask mandates [387]
    • The potential educational harms of mandatory-masking policies are much more firmly established, at least at this point, than their possible benefits in stopping the spread of COVID-19 in schools.
    • The World Health Organization, which recommends that children 12 and older wear masks under the same circumstances that adults do, specifically advises against masking kids age 5 and younger.
    • Many European nations have been taking the agency’s advice. The United Kingdom has emphasized rapid testing instead of masking and has not required elementary-school students or their teachers to wear a face covering.
    • Scientists have known for some time that outdoor transmission is exceedingly rare, and many experts believe that outdoor masking is misguided.
    • The evidence to support school mask mandates for young kids is fragmentary at best.
    • Unfortunately, scientists have failed to conduct the kind of randomized trials that can provide more reliable answers.
    • In mid-March 2020, few could argue against erring on the side of caution. But nearly 18 months later, we owe it to children and their parents to answer the question properly: Do the benefits of masking kids in school outweigh the downsides? The honest answer in 2021 remains that we don’t know for sure.
  • To date, there has not been a single comprehensive study in the United States showing that children should wear masks in school or that masks would help them or anyone else in any way.
  • The closest we've gotten: An op-ed in The New York Times
    • Authors: Two people from Duke University
    • The headline: We studied one million students, universal masking works."
    • Journalist David Zweig investigated the study He found that every single one of the one million students went to schools that already had mask mandates. Those are the only kids they studied. In other words, there was no control group.
    • Zweig reached out to the so-called researchers. Initially, they agreed to talk to him. Then he asked them to explain why they had ignored schools that don't have mask mandates, schools in big places like Florida or Ireland or many other countries in Europe. These schools, it turns out, have not seen a surge in COVID cases. You'd think that would be worth knowing.
    • The researchers didn't respond. They just ignored David Zweig. Is that science? [249]
The numbers don’t justify it
  • "A tremendous number of government and private policies affecting kids are based on one number: 335. That is how many children under 18 have died with a Covid diagnosis code in their record, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Yet the CDC, which has 21,000 employees, hasn’t researched each death to find out whether Covid caused it or if it involved a pre-existing medical condition." [160]
  • "My research team at Johns Hopkins worked with the nonprofit FAIR Health to analyze approximately 48,000 children under 18 diagnosed with Covid in health-insurance data from April to August 2020. Our report found a mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition such as leukemia. If that trend holds, it has significant implications for healthy kids and whether they need two vaccine doses." [160]
  • UK scientists: "Three major studies over the past year all found the risk of death to be in the range of 1 in 100,000 to 1 in 1 million. Hospitalization rates for school-aged kids younger than 12 hovered around 3 or 4 per million throughout the pandemic." [161]
Masks are harmful to students
  • European study: Students' breath captured in masks raised the carbon dioxide levels in inhaled air 13 times above safe levels from prior research. [162]
  • Here's what is on masks. [22]

Summary: If Walensky's statements are any indication, Health Passports/Passes will be in our future.

  • (9/14/21) Vax cards black marketing is taking shape
    • Cost, pre-Biden announcement: Approximately $100 (1,000 vendors). [457]
    • Cost, post-Biden announcement: Approximately $200 (10,000 vendors). [457]
    • FBI Alert: Those who opt for phony cards that use an official government seal are committing a felony and could be sent to prison for five years. [457]
  • (9/13/21) Hot mic catches Israeli Health Minister admitting vaccine passports are really about coercion. [445]
  • (8/29/21) Video: French shoppers blocked from entering a supermarket by police because they don’t have COVID passports. [306]
  • (8/8/21): Fake Covid Vaccination Cards are on the rise in the U.S., Europe; Vaccine mandates have fueled an increase in demand for fraudulent certificates as sellers flourish online [213]
  • The Key to NYC Pass [90]
  • One proposal: Unjabbed should be placed on no-fly list. [79]
  • (7/27/21): Walensky (speaking on the subject of health passes): "You know, I think some communities are doing that, and that may very well be a path forward." [163]

Summary: The world experiments with various degrees of mask/injection mandates and more. Wanna place any bets as to where this is eventually headed?

General News

  • Australia
    • Here's a video of a child being dragged away from a parent to be forcibly given the jab. [287]
    • (8/18/21) 24,000 children herded into the Qudos Bank Arena for their first shot...without advance parental notice nor permission.
      • New South Wales Minister for Health and Medical Research Brad Hazzard made the disturbing announcement at a press conference earlier this month, calling the students’ conditional vaccine requirement to get jab to participate in school in the fall as a “golden opportunity.”
      • “Maybe mum and dad can drop you. Your mum or dad, or one of your family drop you. Make sure they stay outside the arena, because we don’t want too many people obviously milling around inside the arena,” Hazzard said. “Make some arrangements for – after you’ve got your access to that golden opportunity of the vaccination – to wait outside for you.”
      • Hazzard made certain to get the point across that parents wouldn’t be permitted to enter the Qudos Bank Arena in Sydney Olympic Park while their children get jabbed.
      • “I want to stress that to the mums and dads, your children will be well looked after inside. When they arrive, they’ll be literally ushered,” Hazzard insisted.
      • “We’ll have nurses, we’ll have some of the youth command, we’ll have some of the young police from various operations with the police there just to guide them through as to where they go. They’ll be looked after every moment inside the stadium and they’ll be well cared for so mums and dads feel secure.”
      • Starting last week, students were herded into Sydney Olympic Park by a line of Australian soldiers at the entrance to receive the Pfizer jab.
      • Authorities confirm the goal is to have 24,000 students jabbed. [271]
    • Field Reports:
      • (8/21/21) Below are photos and videos taken by one student showing 5 kids dropping, including 1 having a seizure. It’s not on Australian news, and according to our JabUpdate.com field reporter, "honestly no one seems to care. People are so blind they and so dumb, they just don’t see it."

      • "I'm Qld Australia and we have been told if we send our kids on the day of the Vax it's implied consent. And they will jab them. Also at the beginning of each school year you sign a medical form which allows the school to be covered for medical intervention. So what I did is write a letter to my kids school telling them they do not have permission to give my children any immunisations at school that these are done by my family doctor and my children being high school students will come home if they are jabbing on that day."
 
  • U.S.
    • Some interesting insights into the forthcoming Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) are emerging.
      • They are to be developed by OSHA requiring compliance by all private employers with 100 or more employees. [432]
      • Employees are to be counted company-wide, not by individual site. [432]
      • The ETS will be effective initially for a six-month period, until a permanent rule is promulgated. [432]
      • Since this is an emergency standard, OSHA will not be accepting public comment or input on the formulation of the ETS. However, once the ETS is issued, OSHA will invite comments and suggested changes in order to implement a permanent rule. [432]
      • The ETS will not apply to remote workers who do not come into the workplace. [432]
      • The ETS will apply not only to employees who come into the workplace, but also to employees who work outside of the worksite but around others. [432]
      • The ETS is expected to require employers to provide employees paid time off to get vaccinated or to recover from any vaccine-related side effects. [432]
      • OSHA does not know at this time who will be required to pay for weekly testing, if it is offered in lieu of vaccination. [432]
      • OSHA has not yet decided on the process employers are to follow for verifying an employee’s vaccination status. [432]
      • OSHA has the authority to issue citations for non-compliance with a penalty of up to $14,000 per violation. [432]
      • The plan calls on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to require COVID-19 vaccinations for workers in most healthcare settings. [432]
      • Through a second Executive Order is included in the plan, federal contractors and subcontractors also will be required to mandate their employees be vaccinated. [432]
    • (9/9/21) Biden announced a new slate of measures today to combat the Delta variant. "This is not about freedom or personal choice," Biden said. "It's about protecting yourself and those around you." [399]
      • Biden decreed from D.C. that (among other things) he would compel all federal employees and companies with more than 100 employees to force their employees to get the injection or be tested weekly. [399]
      • (It's a bird-flip at congress. Congress is supposed to make new laws, not an unaccountable bureaucratic agency. Since when do we live in a dictatorship where policy can be created and enforced at the whim of one man?) The assertion that a public official can completely sidestep the legislative process and enact a much farther-reaching vaccine mandate via administrative action should elicit skepticism from even those who vigorously support vaccination. [400]
      • So much for going with the science: Against the advice of medical experts, boosters will be rolled out by Sept. 20. 2021. [401] 
      • Where's the statistical justification for this?
      • The policy was poorly conceived: While more than 70 percent of American adults have received a shot, a smaller but sizable group of people, for various reasons, are unvaccinated. Some members of this group have antibodies from a previous Covid case and are reasonably protected from future illness, according to recent data. There is little benefit to forcing vaccination on such people, and Mr. Biden's decision to not exempt them is a significant misstep. [400]
      • You can bet your life it'll be litigated: Todd Zywicki, a law professor at George Mason University in Virginia who had recovered from Covid and has antibodies, recently fought his institution's mandate and prevailed. And Republican governors are certain to battle Mr. Biden over this policy. Gov. Kristi Noem of South Dakota, a Republican, tweeted at the president, "See you in court." [400]
      • Could Biden beat the Republican governors in court re: mandates? It's possible, maybe even probable. Here's a good summary re: the possible precedent-setting Jacobson v. Massachusetts.
        • In that landmark decision, the court ruled 7-2 that vaccine mandates are not unconstitutional, and a state had the authority to enforce mandatory vaccinations. [415]
        • That decision was further affirmed in the 1922 case Zucht v. King, when the Supreme Court ruled that the school district of San Antonio, Texas, could exclude students who hadn't received required vaccinations. [416]
        • The federal government has never attempted to issue a vaccine mandate to the scale of Biden's. The ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts never expressly grants the federal government the power to issue a vaccine mandate, only states and municipalities. [417]
        • Jacobson v. Massachusetts also left the door open for exemptions: "They left some room to say that if someone has a medical objection to vaccination and can demonstrate that harm would come to them, they might have a constitutional right to avoid vaccination." [417]
        • But courts have historically been deferential to health orders, especially during disease outbreaks. [418]
        • Can the Dept. of Labor issue a binding rule requiring large employer injection mandates? The Labor Department may only act pursuant to an act of Congress. So unless Congress passes a new law, the department must rely on an existing statute if it wishes to regulate employers. [419]
      • There is precedent for striking down protracted emergency orders without legislative involvement. [418]
        • However, the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH) permits the Labor Department to act. Among other things, that law permits the Secretary of Labor to issue an “emergency temporary standard” regarding workplace health or safety if they determine that “employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful,” and that such a standard is “necessary to protect employees from such danger.” [419]
      • Litigation challenging the Biden administration’s new vaccination rules is likely to focus on whether the Covid-19 pandemic meets the legal standard required to issue such an emergency rule — including whether Covid-19 presents a “grave danger” and whether the administration's proposed rule is “necessary” to protect workers from that danger. [419]
    • Don't worry; there will never be a national mandate.
      • (7/31/21) Rochelle Walensky, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said the same thing: "There will be no nationwide mandate. I was referring to mandates by private institutions and portions of the federal government. There will be no federal mandate." [398]
      • (7/23/21) Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, recently reiterated Mr. Biden's position. "That's [a government mandate] not the role of the federal government." [398]
      • (12/20) Biden said he would not force anyone to get the jab. “No, I don’t think it should be mandatory,” he told reporters. “No, I don't think it should be mandatory. I wouldn't demand it to be mandatory. Just like I don't think masks have to be made mandatory nationwide.” [397]
    • On CNN, (8/29/21) Fauci said, "I believe that mandating vaccines for children to appear in school is a good idea." [320]
    • Yet in the U.S., there were 28,171 deaths among 5-14 year olds in 2020. Of those, 67 are attributed to Covid-19. That's 2/10 of 1% of all deaths. [321]
    • Experts pushing back against the move today argued it may be better for children to catch Covid and recover to develop natural immunity than to be reliant on protection from vaccines, which studies suggest wanes in months. [322]
    • (8/25/21) In Washington State, student athletes must wear COVID tracing "proximity monitors" [286]
      • A public school in Washington state requires student athletes participating in high-contact or moderate-contact indoor sports to wear proximity monitors to help the school with COVID-19 social distancing and contact tracing.
      • The requirement applies to vaccinated and unvaccinated students and staff while they are participating in the sport.
      • The devices track proximity, not location, and monitor whether and for how long people wearing the devices are near one another.
    • Here's a video of a child being dragged away from a parent to be forcibly given the jab. [287]
    • (8/9/21) Pentagon set to require COVID vaccine for all active-duty troops by Sept. 15 [216]
    • (7/30/21) Fox News "Q: Are you for mandating a vaccine on a federal level? A (Walensky): You know, that's something I think the (Biden) Administration is looking into. It's something I think we're, we're, looking to see approval of the vaccine. Um, overall I think in general, I am all for, um, more vaccination, um, but, you know, I have nothing further to say on that except we're looking into those policies. And quite honestly, as people are doing that locally, um, those are individual local decisions as well." [174]
    • Minutes later, Walensky said she was referring to private institutions and portions of the federal government (which, as you can see in the above quote, was never mentioned):

    • (7/29/21): Biden announced that the COVID "vaccine" is now mandatory for all federal workers, federal contractors and armed forces. Other major employers have announced identical mandates. [128], [155]
    • (7/26/21): Department of Justice: Employer, university vaccine mandates legal [182]

Summary: Governments are "better educating" people about the jab. Uh-huh.

  • North Carolina county launches 'doses to doors' jab campaign. [77]
  • New Zealand will “chase after” and “find” the unjabbed. [67]

Summary: Despite what the World Health Organization says about (the ineffectiveness of) lockdowns, Australia and Britain are apparently competing to see who can have the most stringent lockdown.

General

  • (8/26/21) Stanford medical professor: Lockdowns are the ‘single biggest mistake in public health history. [316]

Australia

  • Are they effective? Here are the facts.

  • (8/20/21) The latest rules from the NSW authorities.
  • Field Reports
    • (8/21/21) "I am NSW Australia.not as bad as Sydney but it isn’t pretty.my child was a close contact so now we are locked in our house even though we are all negative.no work.groceries delivered but can’t open door till they left.we are all healthy people who love the sun.I have two children with mental health issues threatening to harm them selves.we have to get another test and wait two days before we can go out front.someone needs to help us all.before it’s too late!people are committing suicide left right and centre.people in so much debt they think it’s the only way out.lost jobs houses and become homeless."
    • "I'm in Australia and we have 3 granddaughters, two of whom are in school. If the parents DO NOT give consent but send their child to school on the day of the vax then it is implied consent. That's what we've been able to find out so far."
    • "I’m in Sydney, they have extended our lockdown until end of sept and we also have curfews and only allowed 1 hour of exercise a day. I thought this was a free country not a jail!! When will they stop this shit?!"
    • "I'm here in hard lock down being berated daily by the govt via the media that those who don't get the jab are selfish and killing people, even though vaccinated people are just as able to get infected and infect others. We've had LESS covid deaths this year than typical year of flu deaths... (Approx 100 deaths out of 26 MILLION people).. the military (have been called in the door) know to ensure casual contacts are isolating. The rest of us in NSW & VIC are in lock down and cannot go more than 5 kms from our house and only for essential purposes, masks are mandatory, even in outdoor settings."
  • (8/16/21) The NSW Police Force launched Operation STAY AT HOME. [263]
    • “We will be issuing $5000 fines to people and closing any businesses which continue to breach the health orders, and will not apologise for these increased enforcement efforts going forward.” [263]
    • “There will be more roadblocks on main arterial roads and backroads from tomorrow, and these operations will continue to expand throughout this week in order to enforce the permit system announced by the NSW Government this morning.” [263]
    • “There will be nowhere to hide if you are doing the wrong thing. If you travel anywhere beyond your LGA at the moment, you are putting everyone else in NSW at considerable risk.  [263]
    • “From the start, this has been about reducing movement across the state and protecting the health and safety of everyone, and this operation significantly strengthens those efforts.” [263]
  • Australia is being locked down again (possibly until Christmas) because citizens are being told that they have to be 80% vaccinated to have freedom again. [169]
  • To reinforce this, the government has deployed the army and helicopters to order people to go home in what is one of the world's strictest Covid lockdowns. [175]
  • There is footage of decontamination tents that have been set up in people's yards in Sydney, Australia.
  • The Australian military is now enforcing martial law.
  • Why? Because nine people died of COVID this summer. Nine people in the entire nation of Australia.
  • Australia's chief health officer is now commanding citizens not to speak to their neighbors. Speaking to other human beings is just too dangerous. [250]

U.S.

  • (4/22/21): The (United) states on lockdown are the states where COVID was growing the most. [165]

U.K.

  • (9/10/21) UK health minister: He doesn't expect to see any more lockdowns, ruled out the use of vaccine passports to allow people to attend mass events. [412]
  • Lockdowns don't work
    • U.K.’s “Freedom Day" (July 18)
      • Brits were allowed to return to bars and night clubs. Many were seen partying in the streets and celebrating the transition into a “new normal.” [258]
      • CNN was, of course, outraged. The floundering fake news outlet called the celebrations a “huge gamble” amid media reports about the scary new “delta variant” that is supposedly spreading. [258]
      • Labour Party leader Keir Starmer called the parties “a reckless free-for-all,” which prompted Imperial College London mathematical biology Prof. Neil Ferguson to declare that it was “almost inevitable” that 100,000 new daily cases of Chinese Germs would emerge in the aftermath. [258]
      • Freedom Day came and went and cases dropped dramatically the moment the restrictions were lifted. [258]
      • “Daily #COVID cases are down 40% in U.K. since ‘Freedom Day’ when the government lifted restrictions,” one person tweeted. “This isn’t what experts predicted.” [258]
  • (7/21/21) The "Pingdemic" has begun in the U.K. (if someone has been diagnosed with COVID-19 and they were recently in close contact with you, your cellphone is "pinged" by the government and you are quarantined for 10 days. No app download required. Still in its infancy, it has produced huge disruptions for businesses and critical services that threaten to undermine efforts to revive an economy still recovering from its deepest recession in 300 years. [85]

Canada

  • (6/27/21) Canada will begin preventing groups from gathering to prevent the spread of "unauthorized information." [61]

Vietnam

  • (8/23/21) Vietnam deploys troops to enforce COVID lockdown in Ho Chi Minh City [293]
    • Witnesses said soldiers are delivering food to residents of the city.

Global

  • Even the WHO's COVID-19 specialist, Dr. David Nabarro (who extols universal jabs as the prescribed solution to a pandemic with a 99.9% survival rate) denounces lockdowns. [60]

"Snitching"

  • Australia going full Soviet over COVID-19: Australian officials call on citizens to snitch on neighbors, stop having friendly conversations. [276]
  • If you break the COVID restrictions, you will get fined $5,000. [277]

Collateral Damage

  • Independent Canadian researchers predict a devastating toll: one study estimates that 5-10 times more life is lost due to lockdowns (measured in years of life lost prematurely, i.e. Canadians dying earlier than they would without lockdowns), as compared to any lives that may have been saved, and another study pegs the costs at up to 282 times greater than the benefits.
  • The collateral damage of lockdowns on our emotional, physical, and mental health is increasingly coming to light. And so is the impact of mobility restrictions on the fabric of society: for more than one year, we have been encouraged to refrain from regular social contact and to perceive those around us as carriers of disease and death. Considering that humans are social beings, this is an unprecedented experiment that might have devastating long-term effects, especially on children. [231]

Preview: There is now talk about "shielding" unjabbed/infected family members from their homes to "comfortable" places to convalesce. Yep, we've (sadly) heard this one before.

U.S.

  • Martial Law
    • How to Survive Martial Law [245]
  • "Shielding" your family members away from the rest of the family
    • (7/27/21) CDC "Shielding" Plan ("Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings")
      • Objective: limit contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”).
      • "Temporarily" "physically" relocating "high-risk individuals" ("older adults, the unvaccinated and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions") to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.
      • This also involves separating families and disrupting and deconstructing multigenerational households.
      • If you read the document carefully, you'll see that there is no plan to release incarcerated "high risk" individuals once they transition to "low risk."
      • They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
      • This will help "prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population."
      • It will be sold as a way to "protect high-risk populations from disease and death."
      • The green zone and living areas for high-risk residents should be aligned with minimum humanitarian standards.
      • Even the proposal says "there is no empirical evidence whether this approach will increase, decrease or have no effect on morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in various humanitarian settings." [242]
  • Isolation Facilities
    • (8/6/21) Tennessee Governor signs executive order:
      • Mandating telephone-based "assessments" where you can be "involuntarily committed" if the government deems you mentally ill or suffering from "a serious emotional disturbance." It remains in effect until October 5, 2021. [218]
      • Mandating construction of "temporary quarantine and isolation facilities." It remains in effect until October 5, 2021. [219]
    • An official Department of Homeland Security training provider is now offering a course for law enforcement, health care workers and other government employees that details how to prepare and execute a mass public isolation and quarantine (I&Q) of the unjabbed in rural areas of the United States. [66] Here is their summary document.

Australia

  • Anyone who tests positive (whether they've been informed or not) will be forcibly removed from their homes. [331]
  • Facilities
    • (8/14/21) Construction is under way on a new quarantine facility in Mickleham, outside Melbourne, AUS. The camp is set to open by the end of the year.[264]
      • It is a 1000-bed accommodation site for "returning travellers" (despite the fact that these days, nobody's leaving their homes in Australia). [264], [326]
    • "Almost like a holiday from the experience" at the facility in Byron Shire, on the north coast of NSW [324]
    • Qld to have two COVID-19 quarantine camps
      • 800-bed facility at Pinkenba and a 1000-bed facility at Wellcamp, near Toowoomba [325]
      • Construction work will begin shortly with the first 500 beds to be operating in the first quarter of next year. [325]

Beyond Isolation

  • UK: Westminster City Council is seeking “temporary body storage services” to prepare for mass extermination events over the next four years. [58]

INFORMATION

  • This website is non-commercial. It has no sponsors and is 100% volunteer-driven. We don't make a cent on this website.
  • Each section of this website is divided into topics and subtopics. Each bullet point is source cited (see here).

  • When it comes to Covid-19, we recognize that there's a lot of covering up, obfuscation, double-speaking, threats, intimidation, coercion and lying which have adversely affected untold millions. This is found among both pro- and anti-jab advocates.
  • Many of these points are then forwarded on, and even go viral, without the critical thinking which is so essential these days.
  • It takes a lot of time and effort to sift through this BS and arrive at the truth. 
  • So, we are dedicated to getting you the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so you can make informed decisions about Covid-19.
  • If information can't be verified or hasn't been spoken of by a known expert, we'll hold off posting it.
  • We are disinterested in rumors, conjectures, suppositions, assumptions, politically-motivated statements or unsubstantiated conclusions.
  • As you read through this website, you'll probably see quite a bit of hypocrisy and facts you haven't read or heard about in the mass media. That's intentional.

  • JabUpdate.com is updated daily (see here) by an international collaboration of friends who are not necessarily pro- or anti-vaccination; many were vaccinated as children, have ensured vaccination of their own children, or not. Yet all recognize that the Covid-19 injections aren't technically vaccines.

  • Sources include both pro- and anti-Covid-19 "vaccine."

We are always looking for more factual information to add! Please contact us here to send us verifiable information.